Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Front\s+crossmember\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: "PHILLIP SILK" <musta32188@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:07:07 -0400
And another question... I have noticed that the bolts attaching my front crossmember/subframe appear to be different lengths (as it appears still attached). Is that normal, or did the previous owner
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00080.html (7,654 bytes)

2. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:21:13 -0400
I think what your seeing is this; the crossmember has an aluminum wedge at the mounting points, the bolts are the same length but the wedge hold one further away. This is normal and there are lots o
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00087.html (8,543 bytes)

3. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: 65Tiger@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:31:33 +0000
The cross member is bolted to the frame through tube nuts which are welded to the frame. There is a tech tip on how to reinforce the tube nuts to the frame. Per my measurements there is 1 5/8 inches
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00143.html (8,311 bytes)

4. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:14:38 -0400
The parts manual list the bolts as 1/2 UNF x 3 1/4 - quantity 4 Ron Fraser Phillip, The cross member is bolted to the frame through tube nuts which are welded to the frame. There is a tech tip on how
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00145.html (8,997 bytes)

5. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:15:55 -0400
The parts manual list the bolts as 1/2 UNF x 3 1/4 - quantity 4 Ron Fraser Phillip, The cross member is bolted to the frame through tube nuts which are welded to the frame. There is a tech tip on how
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00146.html (9,058 bytes)

6. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:09:57 -0400
UNF is the Unified bolt series that the US and Great Britain put together during WW II so they would be compatible. There is a slight angle of the thread difference between them. The British Whitwor
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00161.html (11,496 bytes)

7. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:50:08 -0700
Here is a quote from: <http://www.homemetalshopclub.org/news/feb03/feb03.html> "Tom Moore presented a program on threaded fasteners followed by Joe Scott's comments on screws used in gunsmithing: Th
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00164.html (11,717 bytes)

8. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: Bill Martin <tigerfixer@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
The Bolt size for the crossmember is unique by todays standard. The grip length is 1 5/8 (unthreaded) and you cannot purchase a 1/2 20 in that grip length off the shelf. To make new crossmember bolt
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00166.html (8,827 bytes)

9. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:31:15 -0600
it's probably better to get a Grade 8 bolt that has the correct (or a little too short) length unthreaded portion, even if it's shorter than 5" overall, than it is to get the right overall length an
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00167.html (8,739 bytes)

10. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:44:24 EDT
I remember asking a machine shop if they would add a little thread to a 1/2" grade 8 bolt. They told me I was nuts and that they wouldn't touch it. Seems it will grind those dies to pieces. ML
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00168.html (8,230 bytes)

11. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:56:25 -0400
My 57 MGA and 59 Tr3 use UNF extensively. Regards, Gary B9472283
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00169.html (8,225 bytes)

12. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: "Frank P. Marrone" <itswonderful@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:01:00 -0700
I had several sets of these bolt made up a number of years ago. It was a small group buy for me and a few other list members. I purchased bolts with the correct grip from an aircraft hardware supplie
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00170.html (9,680 bytes)

13. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: DJoh797014@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:15:06 EDT
Go to your nearest Caterpillar dealer and order your bolts. Their catalogue lists about every bolt and nut you need. All are American made, grade 8 or better, rolled threads, and oil phosphate treate
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00172.html (8,373 bytes)

14. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Someone" <tonythetiger@onecliq.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:30:51 -0500
List- My past problems wherent with the bolts but w/ the welds. The welds had broken on one side, unknown to myself, Im thankful I was turning around in a gas station when the oppisite side let loose
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00173.html (8,712 bytes)

15. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:40:25 -0700
With all due respect to what others have written regarding bolt, threads, lengths etc., here is my own experience. 1. I replaced my crossmember bolts with grade 8. Yes, I was caught between two sizes
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00174.html (10,455 bytes)

16. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:00:44 -0700
rotary left. Sometimes the theory of doing If you were to take a microscope and look at the roots of the threads you cut, you would find lots of small tears. All of those are initiation points for fa
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00175.html (9,567 bytes)

17. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: 65Tiger@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 04:28:43 +0000
The original discussion of this thread was whether to use the longer bolt in the back or front (it goes in the back). I mentioned that I used Grade 8 bolts and that seemed to kick off an interesting
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00176.html (9,089 bytes)

18. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:28:28 -0400
There is a slight difference between UNF threads and SAE fine threads and your 1/2" - 20 tap has now change the threads to SAE fine. The UNF bolt will now feel loose in those threads. Since you chang
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00177.html (9,331 bytes)

19. RE: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:25:34 -0400
There is only a slight angle of the threads difference between Unified and SAE threads. If you use a Unified bolt as the tap and then thread an SAE bolt in your ok; there is only a slight bit of int
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00180.html (9,112 bytes)

20. Re: Front crossmember (score: 1)
Author: Robert Dobrowski <rsdslp@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:18:29 -0700
I don't understand your statement that SAE threads are different from Reading through my SAE handbook it specifically calls out the use of UNF threads on SAE fasteners. On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:28:28 -
/html/tigers/2005-06/msg00186.html (9,563 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu