Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Front\s+suspension\s+rebuild\s+options\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:55:13 -0600
I'm in the process of dismantling my front end in order to rebuild it. As I'm currently exploring my options, I'd like some input from the list. 1) I've been running on the assumption that I'll need
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00299.html (8,492 bytes)

2. Re: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:47:52 -0800
I think that common wisdom is that the V-8 style are the best compromise of longevity and performance. -- I've found something worse than oldies station that play the music I used to listen to. Oldie
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00307.html (8,481 bytes)

3. Re: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: "james" <jhn3@uakron.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:45:10 -0500
Chuck, I have one car with v8 style bushings and one with energy suspension polys. I would say the difference is negligible, the polys are stiffer, but I doubt you will really feel it in daily drivin
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00309.html (9,796 bytes)

4. Re: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:38:10 -0000
... and don't be put off by the 'have to be pressed in' comment. This is easily done with a little washing-up liquid, a couple of sockets and a vice after making sure the inside of the A-arm holes ar
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00313.html (8,470 bytes)

5. Re: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Meyer" <wcameyer@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:21:45 -0700
Why should it be necessary to torque the V8's at ride height? Won't the steel sleeve rotate on the bolt? Bill half /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00328.html (7,988 bytes)

6. FW: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:43:11 -0800
Correctly installed the steel sleeve is designed to seize in place. The outer rubber seizes to the arm. All movement is in the rubber torsion. Very, very important. This is the way all rubber type b
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00330.html (8,954 bytes)

7. RE: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: Dennis Luther <DennisLuther@PrimHall.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:42:48 -0500
You touched on the subject I was about to broach.... So why is there lubricant included with the poly bushings I bought from Moss? I've been busy cleaning off the spindles and housings of my suspens
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00334.html (8,729 bytes)

8. RE: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:34:51 -0800
Poly bushings DO work by pivoting. That's why many poly bushing kits come with lubricant. I prefer the black Poly bushings as they are a bit softer and don't need a lubricant to keep from squeeking.
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00342.html (9,497 bytes)

9. RE: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:27:11 -0600
Thanks to everyone who offered advice regarding my front end rebuild. It sounds like the general consensus is that the V-8 bushings are the best all around bet. As for the kingpins, at least one side
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00352.html (7,916 bytes)

10. Re: Front suspension rebuild options (score: 1)
Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:07:43 -0000
The sleel sleeve is clamped tight (not siezed) by the big washers and nut and the rubber doesn't want to rotate in the A-arm. /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://w
/html/mgs/2003-03/msg00372.html (8,172 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu