Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Sending\s+unit\s+calibration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Sending\s+unit\s+calibration\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: Marc <smarc@smarc.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:02:17 -0400; Is there some procedure for calibration of a sending unit, or a way to set float height? I have checked all my books and shop manuals (Complete Official MGB, Haynes), can't seem to find this info. Th; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00107.html (7,681 bytes)
2. Re: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: James Harwood <james.harwood@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:26:33 -0700 (PDT); I'm not sure if this is any help, the info was posted recently on another MGB forum and I made a copy of it: Gauge Reading Min. 1/4 1/2 3/4 Max. Resistance ohms 320 205 120 85 55 I'm not at all sure; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00108.html (8,263 bytes)
3. Re: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 18:56:00 +0100; Not really. It hits the top stop slightly before the tank is completely full and the bottom stop slightly before it is fully empty, it is crude as that and not at all critical, hence no specification; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00117.html (7,819 bytes)
4. Re: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "oliver" <sumton@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:22:09 -0500; since we're on this topic sort of, my car indicates full when full, and then as you drive it appears to move a little too quickly to 3/4, then pretty much reads empty. i've refurbed the sending unit;; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00141.html (8,360 bytes)
5. Re: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:07:19 +0100; NLA? Since when? This design of sending unit was used from 65 to 76, and modern units with slightly different calibration have been available in the UK for many years. Moss US may be showing it as N/; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00142.html (7,714 bytes)
6. RE: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:53:19 -0700; The supplied 66-76 sending units have had a tendency to leak from the connector seal when exposed to the additives currently in the fuel found many places in the U.S. Moss U.S. blocked sales on this; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00162.html (8,440 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:02:15 +0100; Surely the *seal* is a different item to the sender, you certainly show them as different parts. Even if a seal is automatically purchased at the same time as a new sender you wouldn't want to purcha; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00198.html (7,707 bytes)
8. RE: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:16:54 -0700; This is the seal in the center of the sending unit mounting plate that the electrical connector goes through, not the mounting plate to tank seal. There are some very nasty additives being used to o; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00200.html (8,600 bytes)
9. Re: Fuel Sending unit calibration (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:45:15 +0100; Ah, I get you. I thought it was the rubber tank seal that had that problem ... or maybe they both did. Cheers, Paul. Paul: This is the seal in the center of the sending unit mounting plate that the e; /html/mgs/2005-09/msg00205.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]