Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Stabilizer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Stabilizer\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: DKeetley@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 20:53:51 -0500; Here's the technological breakthrough we've all been waiting for! The fuel How would you like virtually no exhaust emissions with ANY engine setup, unbelieveable throttle response, more horsepower, b; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00150.html (8,542 bytes)
2. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrco.com (Mark Jurras); Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 09:15:10 -0500; What are the patent numbers on this device? - -Mark; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00179.html (7,468 bytes)
3. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton); Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 16:35:28 +0500; Uh oh. I can actually *hear* the "snake oil" klaxons going off around the net. *No* exhaust emissions? Only if the engine isn't running. Lots of folks pass emissions tests with cars set up like that.; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00188.html (8,223 bytes)
4. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 20:06:00 -0500; Boy, were the 60's good to you! R. Johnson - Dallas; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00198.html (7,462 bytes)
5. Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: black@marketsource.com (Michael S. Black); Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 12:51:26 -0500; Has anyone been checking this place out?? I happened to ask for more info and got directed to the Website (http://www.insetindustries.com). On this site they have quite a few remarkable testimonials; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00252.html (8,553 bytes)
6. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: DKeetley@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 20:52:22 -0500; Yes, it does solve the NJ inspection easily as I've done it twice without any special tuning...a first in many years. Dave Keetley 74 Midget; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00279.html (7,637 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel stabilizer (score: 1): Author: etlsjfr@deep-thought.ericsson.se (Steve Foster); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 96 10:58:28 GMT; I'm in the UK. But I'll gladly post $10 to the coordinator of this. Mike, Can I have your postal address. Steve U.K; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00478.html (7,469 bytes)
8. Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: black@marketsource.com (Michael S. Black); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 10:16:55 -0500; Amazing isn't it how people will waste so much effort talking about how something MUST be a con rather than investing a similiar amount of time calling up the company (or heaven forbid some of the te; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00487.html (9,466 bytes)
9. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: Stephen Brook <em92ssb@brunel.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 15:42:22 GMT; So you really don't care about any of the effects that the device could be having as long as it gets you through the next emissions test? Well personally I don't much care for something if I don't h; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00491.html (8,507 bytes)
10. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: TRIFARI@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 13:35:19 -0500; A few hopefully final thoughts on this issue: If the device is patented, you can call the US patent office or go down to a patent library (there's one in Sunnyvale CA for example) and get the actual; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00492.html (9,602 bytes)
11. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton); Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 01:27:11 +0500; The web page says "no electro magnet." No mention of a permanent magnet. If it contains no magnet at all, shouldn't the web page explicitly say so? -- Jay Tilton | jtilton@vt.edu http://fbox.vt.edu:1; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00530.html (7,692 bytes)
12. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: Johnmowog@aol.com; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 03:36:11 -0500; AH HA! Bought by state employees! Those wonderful folks who staff our DMVs, Air Resourses Boards, Employment offices, ...the real cream of the crop of human potential realized...NOT All your anecdote; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00547.html (8,231 bytes)
13. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: Johnmowog@aol.com; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 03:41:03 -0500; By the way, "trade secret" means only that they can sue your but off if you reveal the internal workings of the device, for the crime of "divuging a trade secret". If it had any merit, it would have; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00548.html (8,340 bytes)
14. Re: Fuel Stabilizer (score: 1): Author: JRoss123@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 14:10:09 -0500; Ok I've lerked long enough on this one. Don't give us testimonials there a joke. The only way to prove this device works is a double blind test! I was involved with a device that made similar claims; /html/mgs/1996-03/msg00621.html (9,955 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]