Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Tank\s+\&\s+Vents\,\s+MGB\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: Jim Juhas <james.f.juhas@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 10:26:33 -0400
I have a 1970 (mostly) MGB with what appears to be a vapor canister in the right rear of the boot. And I have the strong aroma of gas when driving, but no obvious leaks. I haven't dropped the tank ye
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00106.html (7,954 bytes)

2. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:48:17 -0500
Sounds like a gas tank problem. The pictures on Moss's website can't be beat for this question. The thing in the tank is the Vapor Separator. The lower end goes to the tank (obviously), the other goe
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00107.html (8,836 bytes)

3. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: Jim Juhas <james.f.juhas@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 11:09:35 -0400
Hmmm, I don't think I have a charcoal canister under the hood. I always figured it should have one if the system was vented. Isn't it supposed to be up front near the radiator? Nor do I have any line
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00108.html (10,244 bytes)

4. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: jello@ida.net
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 09:19:52 US/Mountain
Removing the tank vent/recovery system should not be difficult. Moss does have good pictures under fuel system/emmission. You do need to block off/seal off the vent line, as well as using a vented ca
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00109.html (9,532 bytes)

5. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 15:10:47 -0400
The charcoal adsorbtion cannister is beside the heater, opposite corner from the hydraulic MCs. Black, with three hoses poking out the top, one 1/2 hole at the bottom. One of the three hoses runs to
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00123.html (10,516 bytes)

6. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:14:00 -0500
As Bob H. points out, fuel vapor recovery has no effect on the engine emissions. There are several emission systems on cars. 1) Fuel Vapor recovery. 2) Exhaust. 3) Other fluid or vaport loss The only
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00128.html (7,945 bytes)

7. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: Jim Juhas <james.f.juhas@snet.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 12:40:50 -0400
I understand the value of evaporative emissions recovery as well as PCV systems, especially regarding their negligible effect on operation. But my issue is that I'm missing the plumbing under the hoo
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00184.html (8,768 bytes)

8. Re: Fuel Tank & Vents, MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:00:14 +0100
If you don't have the plumbing up front then it is a non-issue either way. If you fit the correct tank seal off the vent pipe and use a vented cap. If you use an earlier non-vented tank just use the
/html/mgs/2003-05/msg00216.html (8,125 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu