Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+sending\s+unit\s+resistance\s+values\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+sending\s+unit\s+resistance\s+values\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: "Eric L. Van Iderstine" <elv1@ra.MsState.Edu>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 13:07:50 -0500 (CDT); I just brought my sending unit in (no I didn't pull it just to reply.) and the values for resistance are. (roughly, digital meter bouncing +/- .2 ohms) 216 ohms at one stop, and 14 ohms on the other.; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00166.html (9,424 bytes)
2. Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: "Eric L. Van Iderstine" <elv1@ra.MsState.Edu>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 13:07:50 -0500 (CDT); I get more confussed the more I read what "Haynes Sez", You have a large difference in the resistance reading which should be correct. I would not suspect the sending unit is bad. If the unit is out,; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00167.html (10,115 bytes)
3. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 16:14:16 -0500 (CDT); Small correction: The fuel gauge and the temp gauge, at least on the later cars, are fed a constant 10V from the (you guessed it) voltage stabilizer mounted under the dash. I don't remember if the or; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00169.html (8,889 bytes)
4. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 10:35:56 -0400 (EDT); Even smaller correction... the voltage stabilizer is a "chopper", and so bounces between 12V and nothing. The resulting output is not constant, but drives a heavily damped or bimetallic meter to the; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00174.html (8,639 bytes)
5. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras); Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:06:33 -0400; Exactly like "RMS" power. - -Mark; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00179.html (8,066 bytes)
6. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: 007 <jmel@netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:20:31 -0700 (PDT); Wouldn't the hitek approach be to use a 10V zener??? Just Wondering Jim Mellander; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00182.html (8,067 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: Alan Wilson <awilson@basenet.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:52:01 -0500 (CDT); I am wondering also. Has anyone tried a zener? Alan '69B; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00198.html (8,135 bytes)
8. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras); Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:36:21 -0400; I'm am wondering if anyone has replaced the voltage stabilizer with a three terminal regulator. This seems a more straight forward approch since no dropping resister needs to be added to protect the; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00199.html (8,623 bytes)
9. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: Silikal@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:08:39 -0400; No, the high tech approach would be to use the dual 6v batteries for most components in the car, then have a lead off of only one 6v cell running to a DC-DC transformer, which steps it up to 11.4 vo; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00201.html (8,443 bytes)
10. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 08:08:57 -0400 (EDT); All this is fine (esp. if you can calibrate the voltage regulator to a pretty sturdy component.. and 2) It's not "original"... Then you also miss the excitement of plugging the tach into the chopped; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00209.html (8,778 bytes)
11. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrington.com (Mark Jurras); Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 08:31:45 -0400; With a potentiometer you can easily make the regulator output adjustable if you must. Because of the design there is much variation from stabilizer to stabilizer. Is it?? True, for this reason I do; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00234.html (9,354 bytes)
12. Re: Fuel sending unit resistance values. (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:35:09 -0400 (EDT); On the order of a turn signal flasher I would suspect. Not as sturdy as a transistorized one (in terms of cycles) but less sensitive to environment perhaps. Luckily the tach is not >supposed< to run; /html/mgs/1995-07/msg00237.html (10,144 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]