Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+vapour\,\s+non\s+tiger\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+vapour\,\s+non\s+tiger\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Derek White" <derekw@sltnet.lk>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:48:34 +0500; Hi all, I am doing some research for a local inventor who has some fuel vaporisation patents. Do any of you know about this technology? I especially want to know why it has not been adopted commercia; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00146.html (10,834 bytes)
2. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:47:22 EDT; I'd rather not have the replies go direct. I'd like to hear the comments:-); /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00147.html (7,269 bytes)
3. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: sosnaenergyconsulting <sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 20:12:16 -0700; 50-75 miles per gallon in a sunbeam tiger! Well, that SORT of relates it... Back in 1980 when I was in college, I attended a lecture by a Hungarian gentleman named Gaylord Mandy who claimed just suc; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00148.html (14,073 bytes)
4. RE: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:15:15 -0700; All carbureted engines use a heated plenum of some kind to improve vaporization, so there is some basis for this idea. However, I'm dubious that there is much improvement to be gained over that prov; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00152.html (12,516 bytes)
5. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "New Mexico Books" <newmexicobooks@bacavalley.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:19:05 -0600; FYI All: Heating fuel to improve vaporization reduces power available from the fuel charge. This is reason that supercharged/turbocharged engines have an "intercooler" to cool the charge before it en; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00157.html (11,816 bytes)
6. RE: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Robert L." <RPalmer@brobeck.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:42:26 -0700; The purpose of an intercooler is to improve volumetric efficiency. Since the air/fuel ratio is about 15:1, that means primarily the amount of air you can stuff into the cylinder. The temperature of; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00158.html (9,636 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:11:29 -0700; Aaaahhh, er, no....The intercooler only cools the charge AIR, not fuel. Used to be in the really olden days that "cool cans" were used at the drags to cool the fuel. But, you know what? Bulk temperat; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00160.html (13,900 bytes)
8. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:04:25 -0700; Ahh, he may be a desert rat, but.... :-) Mayf, I think we are in a danger of discussing at cross purposes. Everybody (nearly) is correct, except all are not discussing the same subject. You are corre; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00162.html (9,710 bytes)
9. RE: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Derek White" <derekw@sltnet.lk>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:23:24 +0500; Since you guys are keeping this thread on the list, I will too. The patents I am researching and will be trying to sell, are to do with flash vapourising part of the fuel (you can see them or any US; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00163.html (8,882 bytes)
10. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:48:55 -0700; Well not working from a schooled mind here, but rather from common sense... It would seem that in the atomization of the fuel a significant amount of heat would be lost therefore negating any positiv; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00166.html (9,590 bytes)
11. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:15:26 -0700; With the possible exception of your "fuel porcolation", which must have something to do with bacon, it sounds about right. "What do you want, power or economy?", as you seem to say. There is a simpl; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00170.html (9,458 bytes)
12. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:52:44 -0700; There is good thought here. I hope that my comments are not out of date already because my ISP "fixed" his unbroken system last night and now he has everyone's email jugged up in his server. Oh, well; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00173.html (13,910 bytes)
13. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:05:02 -0700; Sorry, if this is a late post on this...Bob, did you really mean 25% fuel mileage lost by blocking the heat riser? 25%? So if I get 20 mpg and block he riser I would only get 15 mpg? My sense on bloc; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00174.html (9,046 bytes)
14. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:56:33 -0700; Ask yourself this question. What does this vapour carburetor do better or cheaper than electronic fuel injection? Gas mileage is nice but emission control is numero uno in the US then comes gas milea; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00175.html (9,517 bytes)
15. Re: Fuel vapour, non tiger (score: 1): Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:00:13 -0700; A mass flow meter is installed in the air intake What you call a mass flow meter better describes the Speed/Density system used by Ford prior to about 1989. The mass air flow meter is a hot wire anem; /html/tigers/2002-10/msg00176.html (8,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]