- 1. Full Advance (score: 1)
- Author: "Bud Pazur" <bpazur@excel.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:27:59 -0500
- OK. I am assembling a new race 948. The engine rebuilder suggested 36 degreees full advance. The engine previously was set at 32 degrees full advance. Kris Larsen said that his car (my car now) shoul
- /html/team-thicko/2005-06/msg00012.html (7,444 bytes)
- 2. Full Advance (score: 1)
- Author: "Bud Pazur" <bpazur@excel.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:52:34 -0500
- Wrongo, Bud Pazur.... ..a less than scientific approach just won't do, providing you want the best YOUR engine will deliver. And, thus.... ....you WILL go the dyno route....'cause that's the only way
- /html/team-thicko/2005-06/msg00013.html (7,718 bytes)
- 3. RE: Full Advance (score: 1)
- Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:12:35 -0500
- In my years of racing, anything over 32 degrees just got me higher engine temps. I have an engine dyno at the Dream Farm, and hope to have it up and running for Thanksgiving weekend's SOS meeting. (
- /html/team-thicko/2005-06/msg00014.html (8,521 bytes)
- 4. Re: Full Advance (score: 1)
- Author: "CHRIS KOTTING" <ckotting@wideopenwest.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:06:05 -0600
- Within a reasonable range, too retarded is better than too advanced. My reasoning is this: If it's getting too hot because it's too retarded, the temp. gauge will tell you before any damage is done.
- /html/team-thicko/2005-06/msg00015.html (8,149 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu