- 1. GMB versus Firespit (score: 1)
- Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 03:57:54 -0000
- Personally, I think I leave you all to fight it out among yourselves and go for a Hurricane instead. Having watched this thread for the last 48 hours or so, I've been in tears of laughter watching yo
- /html/mgs/1998-03/msg00335.html (11,662 bytes)
- 2. Re: GMB versus Firespit (score: 1)
- Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory)
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 01:20:44 -0500
- Gee, I don't know what kind of tirade has been going on at the triumphs list, but there's been nothing like that over here at mgs@autox.team.net! I saw the young man's post on the british cars list
- /html/mgs/1998-03/msg00337.html (7,292 bytes)
- 3. Re: GMB versus Firespit (score: 1)
- Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen)
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:32:15 -0700
- Hello John: You have made some excellent points. However as the one who is "talking out of his armpit" you have agreed with my point regarding the durability of the engines. The MGB engine was improv
- /html/mgs/1998-03/msg00366.html (14,765 bytes)
- 4. Re: GMB versus Firespit (score: 1)
- Author: Bob MGT <BobMGT@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 23:16:43 EST
- You can debate all you want on which marque is superior, but nobody has a logo as cool as the art-deco MG octagon. Nooooobody! Bob Donahue (Still stuck in the '50s) EMAIL - BOBMGT@AOL.COM 52 MGTD - u
- /html/mgs/1998-03/msg00410.html (6,707 bytes)
- 5. Re: GMB versus Firespit (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Houser <mgs4dave@warwick.net>
- Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 09:27:17 +0000
- but nobody has a logo as cool as the art-deco MG octagon. Nooooobody! Right you are, Bob!! I see these shapes in my dreams. And it would be the ONLY tatoo I'd ever Cheers, Dave Houser
- /html/mgs/1998-03/msg00430.html (6,776 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu