- 1. GMC 6 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Rose" <jimrose@lightstream.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:16:49 -0400
- Well, the 6 cyl GMC is in a '72 dump truck that's been parked for years. Body's shot, bed's wasted, but I know it ran strong when it was parked. My guess is a 302. I know it doesn't EXACTLY fit the '
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00596.html (7,570 bytes)
- 2. Re: GMC 6 (score: 1)
- Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 02:52:24 EDT
- Be careful that it's not a 7-main bearing 292ci 6 cyl. that would fall into a modern engine class. I believe that GM started using that engine in the late 50's. If the donor truck is a 1972 chances a
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00604.html (8,138 bytes)
- 3. Re: GMC 6 (score: 1)
- Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
- That 302 definitely fits into nostalgia. When I was in high school, (1956-1960 - and if that ain't nostalgia, I don't know what is) the flathead was king. I had a '46 Chev business coupe that was lo
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00619.html (9,354 bytes)
- 4. Re: GMC 6 (score: 1)
- Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:35:27 EDT
- Dick, Great story. We need more like this on the list. When I built my first racing Flatty in 1953 strokers were practically unheard of on the street. The Flatty was in its last year of production an
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00629.html (9,398 bytes)
- 5. GMC 6 (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 04:55:10 -0700
- Actually, doesn't the rule say "engines designed before 1959?" ** David & list, The above statement is correct. The 235 High Torque you were going to run is a design from '53 I believe. DW /// /// la
- /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00642.html (6,976 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu