- 1. Re: GO ELSEWHERE (score: 1)
- Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:57:25 EDT
- << IMHO, I think the animosity crept in when Leyland took over BMC/MG and pushed their own cars over MG. In some instances, they were more or less crammed down the MG dealer/MG enthusiasts throat. >>
- /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01493.html (7,193 bytes)
- 2. Re: Go Elsewhere (score: 1)
- Author: "kcmgb" <kcmgb@kc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:21:26 -0500
- To the List: I was not trying to insult anyone nor was I trying to offend ether, what I was trying to point out is that there are multi-LBC owners out here that may own a MG AND a Triumph or a Healy
- /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01504.html (8,591 bytes)
- 3. Re: GO ELSEWHERE (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:40:27 -0700
- ATWEDITOR@aol.com had this to say: Actually, MG sales were holding up fine right to the end, looking at the figures (considering that 1980 was only a partial year). This makes their decision to pull
- /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01516.html (7,790 bytes)
- 4. Re: GO ELSEWHERE (score: 1)
- Author: "Charles Sorkin" <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 16:57:23 -0400
- I think that the issue of MG enthusiasts deriding the Triumph makes refers to irritation that after British Leyland acquired BMC, quality took a turn for the worse, and resources were diverted away f
- /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01548.html (7,454 bytes)
- 5. Re: Go Elsewhere (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 21:39:59 EDT
- **Well, half of them, anyway ;-) **While you may be in the States, you are making the rather chauvenistic assumptions that : a - everyone else that matters on the net is also American, and b - we all
- /html/mgs/2000-08/msg01554.html (7,227 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu