Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT\-6\s+engine\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT\-6\s+engine\s+conversion\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 07 Jun 96 10:23:23 EST; I am rebuilding from rust a '69 GT + and tho want to retain as original am considering installation of TR-6 engine vice the GT-6 Mark I engine I currently have. I would like to keep the Mark I overdr; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00159.html (7,678 bytes)
2. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 09:44:17 -0500; With the correct clutch plate it should be a snap installing a TR6 engine into a GT6. Except: The carb setup on a TR6 engine may not fit under the bonnet. I don't know for sure, but it's a tight fit; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00161.html (7,588 bytes)
3. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 96 13:48:31 MDT; Larry, Interesting you should be commenting on this subject. A Line participant in Austin has done the conversion, and I am in process of building a "Street" engine for the same conversion. Also, Ni; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00182.html (10,102 bytes)
4. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 96 13:52:05 MDT; Peter, See my response to previous post. My server seems to work backwards. It posts new messages before older ones. I have a 69 GT6+ body I would like to possibly dispose of. Complete body, chassis; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00183.html (8,639 bytes)
5. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 02:26:40 -0400; You ask about putting a TR6 engine in your GT6... I feel that Tony and I ought to have a standard answer that could be posted to the group every coupla months, just to cover this question. Here's my; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00202.html (9,328 bytes)
6. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 96 12:01:59 MDT; Hey Nick, Where ya' been? Haven't heard from you in a while. You know, I don't think there is any answers or proceedures that can be considered "stock answers", if for no other reason than there are; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00210.html (8,943 bytes)
7. RE: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 1996 08:47:53 +0200; As Tony pointed out - I am in Austin, TX, and have the setup you are talking about. I have an early TR6 engine (or perhaps a TR250 - that question is still up in the air) with a late head (post 1972); /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00213.html (8,761 bytes)
8. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 15:07:10 -0400; I'll admit that it's been quite some time since I've had a GT6 gearbox disassembled, but I don't remember the lay gear being bronze. I'd be surprised if bronze would hold up for very long in such an; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00249.html (8,209 bytes)
9. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 13:18:28 MDT; Bruce, I've got two GT6 and one TR6 transmixers open at this moment. Both GT6 boxs contain a bronze lay gear while the TR6 box has steel. In addition, the steel gear is longer and the lay shaft is a; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00250.html (8,891 bytes)
10. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 12:56:53 PDT; Sorry Toni, I have to agree with Bruce. I have rebuilt quite a few GT6 gearbox's I've never seen a bronze lay gear, bronze bush vs. needle bearings yes but not bronze lay gear. But there's a first ti; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00253.html (8,062 bytes)
11. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 16:01:54 -0400; Now you've got me curious. The gear boxes that I've had open in the past were from +'s or MkIII's. Any idea what year your two are? regards bkh 71 GT6; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00254.html (8,284 bytes)
12. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 16:04:24 MDT; Bruce, One is from a 67 Gt6, the other is 66. The TR6 is fron a 72. I know I'm not going nuts. In both the GT6 trannies, the lay gear is a heavy copper color bronze gear. One end has a row of teeth; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00259.html (9,243 bytes)
13. RE: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:50:44 -0500; Just a small question: Is that header for a TR6 or GT6? (I didn't think the TR6 header would fit in there!) -Bill; mah16@cornell.edu; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00266.html (8,753 bytes)
14. RE: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 19:55:50 MDT; Bill, The headers for the GT6 and early TR6 and TR250 will bolt up. Only difference, is some name brands come out from the head a little further than other before they start the downward bend. Best; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00268.html (9,376 bytes)
15. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:26:30 -0500 (CDT); I had 3 early Spitfire transmissions of various vintage spread around my basement this spring and all had steel laygears. Cheers, Mike mburdick@netserv.unmc.edu http://www.unmc.edu/~mburdick; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00274.html (7,919 bytes)
16. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 11:23:30 -0400; Try counting the number of teeth on each gear of the laygear cluster as well as on the corresponding teeth of the gears on the mainshaft. Some simple division should give you the ratios of 1st thru; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00316.html (7,841 bytes)
17. Re: GT-6 engine conversion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 96 12:09:31 MDT; Chet, Fastest way I know of to check for vaccuum leaks is with starting fluid or combustible carb. cleaner. With engine running,spray each connection where possible leak might occurr. If engine spee; /html/triumphs/1996-06/msg00707.html (8,531 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]