Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT\s+fenders\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT\s+fenders\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. GT fenders.... (score: 1): Author: Ross MacPherson <arm@unix.infoserve.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 19:15:32 -0700; Greetings List, the quest continues...... Can someone tell me what the difference is between the front fenders on a `66 and a `69 GT? British Motor Heritage offers new fenders for GT's `69 and later; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00790.html (7,078 bytes)
2. Re: GT fenders.... (score: 1): Author: ek_john_luthy <luthy@cesd.servtech.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 00:56:11 -0400 (EDT); Ross; The "fill" is a part of the fender. It is steel, DO NOT TRY TO PRY THE FENDER OFF BY BREAKING THE "FILL". I have seen hundreds of gt fenders that were damaged by people trying to "dig out the "; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00793.html (8,571 bytes)
3. RE: GT fenders.... (score: 1): Author: Ernest Gilbert <barrister@lawref.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 96 14:34:08 -0700; The only shape difference is in the turn signal mounting area. Through 68 the mounting was raised noticably from the fender contour. 69 and later the turn signal mounting is nearly flush. Also 68 and; /html/mgs/1996-06/msg00822.html (7,738 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]