Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT\s+or\s+not\s+GT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT\s+or\s+not\s+GT\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. GT or not GT (score: 1): Author: "Randy Rees (Starwave)" <Randyr@starwave.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 96 12:13:00 PDT; Question to a dilemma. If I had a 65 GT and the serial numbers on the car are GHNxxxxxx but the moss catalog says a GT should be GHDxxxxxx whats up? Also what if you had a GT that was a rust bucket a; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01097.html (7,634 bytes)
2. Re: GT or not GT (score: 1): Author: PHILIPPE TUSLER <TUSLER@mp050.mv.unisys.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 12:26:43 -0700 (PDT) (19:26 UT); Everyone will, I'm sure, correct me, but 1966 is the first year that the MG/MGB-GT was made. ** *Philippe Tusler - Mission Viejo, CA | "MILOU" '57 MGA Roadster * *A-Mail: <TUSLER@MP050> | "TINTIN" '6; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01099.html (7,092 bytes)
3. Re: GT or not GT (score: 1): Author: Kai Radicke <104071.2715@CompuServe.COM>; Date: 29 Aug 96 18:29:26 EDT; The first MGB GT was made in 1965 (the RHD in Sept. and the LHD in Nov.) By the way I know a guy who has a 1974 1/2 MGB GT sitting around waiting to become parts. This car is definetly a project (ver; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01102.html (6,926 bytes)
4. RE: GT or not GT (score: 1): Author: Ernest Gilbert <barrister@lawref.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 96 09:15:25 -0700; If you had a 65 GT it would indeed be rare since none were imported that year. What you have is what my clients call a number job. Someone has taken the original serial off and replaced it with a ro; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01141.html (8,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]