Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+head\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+head\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. GT6 head (score: 1): Author: Jim Jones <jimjcmo@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:47:45 -0700 (PDT); The seller for this GT6 head on Ebay says it's from a late model car and is in demand by TR6 owners because it's a higher compression head. I'm not planning on bidding on it, but I am curious as to; /html/6pack/2004-08/msg00270.html (7,082 bytes)
2. RE: GT6 head (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:07:32 -0700; While I can't tell if it is a GT6 head just by looking, the GT6 heads are much higher compression when installed on a TR6 short block. The reason is that the GT is a shorter stroke version of the mo; /html/6pack/2004-08/msg00272.html (8,794 bytes)
3. Re: GT6 head (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:44:36 -0400 (EDT); Oh - it'll raise the compression... like a LOT. I don't have the numbers committed to memory, but last time I looked the late heads had combustion chambers in the 40-41 cc range. With a stock bore/st; /html/6pack/2004-08/msg00274.html (7,736 bytes)
4. Re: GT6 head (score: 1): Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:09:10 +0100; The recent post querying suitability of GT6 head on a TR (?) is, with respect to the various replies I read, not an exact science. Contrary to popular opinion there were many variations on the basic; /html/6pack/2004-08/msg00286.html (7,858 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]