Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+rebuild\s+begins\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+rebuild\s+begins\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:48:44 -0600; I fear this list is going to receive a fair number of these from me over the next few (several?) months. A bit of background first. The beast has been sitting patiently in the garage for about 10 yea; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00254.html (8,184 bytes)
2. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 06:22:27 -0700; ** O.K. you asked. . .In my humble opinion, not the best of ideas Unless your also planing to replace the tranny with a TR6 (difficult at best) or replace GT6 trannys quite often, then don't use a 2; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00264.html (8,307 bytes)
3. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 10:15:42 -0400; Funny this should come up, because I was just pondering the same issue. As per the transmission, it would definitely seem to be "the weakest link ... goodbye!" -- but I've seen Terry Hurrell of Trium; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00265.html (10,378 bytes)
4. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:47:15 -0700; Not to belabor the point, but what kills trannys is not horsepower per se, but torque. Even a 160hp 2.0 probably still doesn't develop as much torque as a stock 2.5; it just does it at a higher rpm.; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00266.html (7,918 bytes)
5. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 11:15:27 -0400; That's not belaboring the point, it's a good one. Rereading the article quoting Hurrell, it's not perfectly clear whether the 160bhp comes from a 2.5 liter engine or not. But the article does say "th; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00267.html (8,505 bytes)
6. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 12:41:11 -0400; Message text written by "Martin Secrest" ... goodbye!" -- but I've seen Terry Hurrell of Triumphtune quoted as saying "we regularly put 160hp into our GT6 transmission without a problem." I suppose t; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00268.html (8,135 bytes)
7. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 17:47:20 -0500; At the expense of clutch life. /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe triumph; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00279.html (7,862 bytes)
8. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 15:47:54 +0100; Hi Scott I can give you some reasoned debate on this point as I have 2000 sedan and 2.5 sedan. First the 2.5 engine is considerably heavier than the 2000, I believe the figure is 80 lbs, but not sure; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00291.html (9,458 bytes)
9. Re: GT6 rebuild begins (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:33:30 -0600; hi Brad Ah, the joys of "tuning" SUs (could be worse - could be Webers - memories of CanAm races, watching the carb gurus selecting jets from suitcase sized kits). Any reason you went with BBE needle; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00301.html (9,346 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]