Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+suspension\s+mods\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. GT6 suspension mods (score: 1)
Author: Gt6steve@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 20:15:28 EDT
Greetings Amici, I hope someone can help...While talking to Luke Stockdale today about our GT6's the question came up as to the validity of 240Z hubs in the rear suspension. Because of the restrictiv
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00044.html (7,105 bytes)

2. Re: GT6 suspension mods (score: 1)
Author: "John Lehman" <JELehman@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 11:07:21 -0400
Steve, et al, My '68 GT6 has Datsun half-shafts and, I believe, hubs. The car passed tech for SCCA (EP) and SVRA (3E) and I think that was the trick set-up back in the early 80's. I'm told it address
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00045.html (6,951 bytes)

3. Re: GT6 suspension mods (score: 1)
Author: Gt6steve@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 12:28:00 EDT
<< Steve, et al, My '68 GT6 has Datsun half-shafts and, I believe, hubs. The car passed tech for SCCA (EP) and SVRA (3E) and I think that was the trick set-up back in the early 80's. I'm told it addr
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00046.html (7,433 bytes)

4. Re: GT6 suspension mods (score: 1)
Author: Gt6steve@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 19:56:43 EDT
<< Interesting debate. We prize above all other cars on the grid those with period history running as close to the spec they were at. What if we now know they were illegal in period? What if the ille
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00065.html (6,940 bytes)

5. Re: GT6 suspension mods (score: 1)
Author: JWoesvra@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 12:56:29 EDT
<< Interesting debate. We prize above all other cars on the grid those with period history running as close to the spec they were at. What if we now know they were illegal in period? What if the ille
/html/fot/2000-08/msg00082.html (8,952 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu