Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gear\s+ratio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gear\s+ratio\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Gear ratio (score: 1): Author: "Bennett, Cullen" <p21988@gegpo8.geg.mot.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 97 09:01:00 MST; Jim, I think something got inverted in our calculation. The effective ratio (for 5th gear) would be 2.88*.65=1.96 which would mean at 3000 rpm, it should be running in the neighborhood of 117 mph (a; /html/tigers/1997-07/msg00375.html (7,908 bytes)
2. Re: Gear ratio (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:06:50 +0100; I would be careful of using the "World Class" Ford 5spd OD, or the earlier model. The size will not fit your tunnel, and it is not very strong. Find shelves full of broken ones at repair shops. Just; /html/tigers/1997-07/msg00376.html (8,366 bytes)
3. Re: Gear ratio (score: 1): Author: "A. C. Tynes" <actynes@communique.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 13:45:02 -0500 (CDT); Concerning using a Ford T-5 5-speed in a Tiger, <Snip> I have a '95 Mustang GTS 302 with the T-5 and a 3.08 rear end. At 70 miles per hour I turn about 1,900 RPM with no feeling that the engine is lu; /html/tigers/1997-07/msg00377.html (8,207 bytes)
4. Re: Gear ratio (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 13:03:41 +0100; Thanks for the signature comment. With the torque that an FI 5.0L GT, I agree that it is no slouch. But, my comments were related to a 260 2BBL. There is a very good T-5 replacement TREMEC (about $1; /html/tigers/1997-07/msg00378.html (7,660 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]