Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gearbox\s+info\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gearbox\s+info\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: derekw@zamnet.zm; Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:43:50 +0200 (ZMT); Hi all, I'm still looking at gearbox options and am looking into the Getrag 5-speed (probably the 265) or a Toyota Supra 5-speed. Both are offered as kits for XKEs and the Getrag is supposed to fit e; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00023.html (8,205 bytes)
2. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 09:30:09 +0000; There are as many opinions on gear boxes, rear end ratios, conversions, and overdrives as there are people who mess with them. For what it's worth, here is my own personal view and experience. Don't; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00024.html (12,308 bytes)
3. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: B&C Mustang <info@bcmustang.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 13:19:53 +0000; t5 facts1 1986 mustang 5.0 265 torque 1992 1993 5.0 300 torque z rated t5 330 torque also top loader 427 was large spline; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00025.html (7,000 bytes)
4. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: Steve Wickland <wickland@hotrail.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 10:38:01 -0800; I really don't know how difficult the Getrag or Toyota transmissions would be but I have to think that it will be worse than a T-5. There are quite a few T-5 Tigers running around so there is a prett; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00026.html (8,667 bytes)
5. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:26:32 +0000; B&C, I won't dispute your facts, they are correct. However, the inference is that since the 427 had a large input spline shaft, the internal gears and parts were equally larger, and of greater capabi; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00027.html (8,965 bytes)
6. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: B&C Mustang <info@bcmustang.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 15:02:37 +0000; big in big out not same 4th gear close ratio only chris m williams; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00028.html (6,862 bytes)
7. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:24:54 +0000; Yes, you are technically correct, as usual, un that note. But the gears and internals are where torque breaks parts, and again, they are the same as the Tiger or Mustang innards. And it won't fit 260; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00030.html (9,007 bytes)
8. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:15:12 -0500; ... Derek, My Tiger Mark II aluminum bell housing is 6 1/4" deep. The block plate that is 70/1000" thick. The transmission is 25 5/8" from front surface to rear surface of casting. The shaft extends; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00039.html (7,619 bytes)
9. Re: Gearbox info (score: 1): Author: RSpontelli@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 19:40:31 EST; << Ramon Spontelli runs a MK II (wide ratio stock) and is right up there with the best there is. Second only to his wife, Theresia. >> Ouch! That's not fair! I beat her sometimes, don't-cha-know? 'n; /html/tigers/2000-03/msg00042.html (7,336 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]