- 1. Re: Gears (again) (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:07:18 -0700
- Nice letter. Gave a good overall thought to the issue. Here are some numbers to chew on. You missed a few issues. Although your recommended 0.75 would be nice, it is not offered by anyone. The fifth
- /html/tigers/2000-10/msg00230.html (12,314 bytes)
- 2. RE: Gears (again) (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 20:39:15 -0700
- That old bamboo slide rule must have really been smokin' by the time you finished your post. You may be interested, however, that there are a variety of gears available for the T5. The following lin
- /html/tigers/2000-10/msg00234.html (7,557 bytes)
- 3. Re: Gears (again) (score: 1)
- Author: SJC Worldwide <rootes@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:09:44 -0700
- Hello Bob: I had my new 5 speed built just like that: 2:95 1st and a .73 5th gear. I'd asked about a slightly higher 5th gear but it was not available for my combination.I described my new hi-po 289
- /html/tigers/2000-10/msg00235.html (9,704 bytes)
- 4. RE: Gears (again) (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 20:48:04 -0700
- It sounds like you are on the right track with the T5 gearing. With regard to the intake manifold, although your guy at Edelbrock may be "very knowledgeable", he certainly isn't infallible; the Tige
- /html/tigers/2000-10/msg00243.html (9,192 bytes)
- 5. Re: Gears (again) (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:26:42 -0800
- Bob, The Performer RPM and the F4B are nearly identical in height and the famous "a" and "b" dimensions, and fit fine without any modifications. There is the carb linkage length and support bracket i
- /html/tigers/2000-10/msg00248.html (8,460 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu