- 1. Gilmer Belts/Pulley; Oil Cooler (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Horstkorta" <horsty@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:32:26 -0800
- Hello All: I will begin the upgrading of my recently purchased TR4 for vintage racing shortly. Two questions for you'all: 1. In Kastner's Triumph Preparation Manual, he describes a Gilmer betl/pulley
- /html/fot/2005-01/msg00375.html (7,264 bytes)
- 2. Re: Gilmer Belts/Pulley; Oil Cooler (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott Janzen" <s.janzen@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:40:52 -0500
- Gilmer - I just bought a great set-up from Jones Racing. I actually used a radius tooth belt, which is lower friction than the square tooth Gilmer. They had a great little expandable collet adaptor t
- /html/fot/2005-01/msg00376.html (8,646 bytes)
- 3. RE: Gilmer Belts/Pulley; Oil Cooler (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:06:44 -0800
- British Frame and Engine (Ken Gillanders) has a nice narrow belt conversion that works very well. Has an aluminum reverse tophat pulley that doesn't toast your bearings or require relocation of the b
- /html/fot/2005-01/msg00377.html (8,111 bytes)
- 4. RE: Gilmer Belts/Pulley; Oil Cooler (score: 1)
- Author: Henry Frye <henry@henryfrye.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:36:49 -0500
- I concur, the BF&E setup works great for me. Does anyone have any real evidence, (like dyno numbers) on how much HP is gained going to a Gilmer setup? Another thought, I am not sure I want my water p
- /html/fot/2005-01/msg00378.html (7,430 bytes)
- 5. RE: Gilmer Belts/Pulley; Oil Cooler (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:49:39 -0800
- I doubt anyone would have anything but a theoretical number. You can very rarely see small changes like that on a dyno. But that's okay, a really good racing motor is a combination of the big things
- /html/fot/2005-01/msg00379.html (8,623 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu