Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Glasspacks\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+ANSA\s+exhaust$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Glasspacks\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+ANSA\s+exhaust$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Glasspacks (was Re: ANSA exhaust) (score: 1): Author: Paulspace@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 02:24:50 -0400; Greg I've used glasspacks before, too, but I've heard that they can actually be restrictive. What have you heard? Maybe it's just the louvered ones that are restrictive, rather than the ones with jus; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00072.html (7,277 bytes)
2. Re: Glasspacks (was Re: ANSA exhaust) (score: 1): Author: Greg Meboe <meboe@wsunix.wsu.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 18:52:26 -0700 (PDT); I wrote that they don't restrict flow like a box muffler, and this was really the scope of the comparison. I have not done any flow measurement tests, so I can't say whether glass packs are more rest; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00083.html (8,111 bytes)
3. Re: Glasspacks (was Re: ANSA exhaust) (score: 1): Author: Paulspace@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 00:17:05 -0400; Greg I know the scope of your comment was glasspacks vs box mufflers, but I've been told over several years that some glasspacks can be worse than a "box" muffler. As far as unrestrictive box types g; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00086.html (7,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]