Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Got\s+Torque\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Got\s+Torque\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Etheridge <maurell@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:40:33 -0600; 50 lbs. sq./in? That seems weak for torquing the head cylinder bolts doesn't it? Jeff '68 1600; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00043.html (7,169 bytes)
2. RE: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: "Gordon Glasgow" <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:58:37 -0800; Yeah and it isn't even in the right measurements. 50 ft/lb would be more like it. Any of the 1600 guys want to confirm this? The U20 uses 65 ft/lb. Gordon Glasgow Renton, WA --Original Message-- From; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00053.html (7,638 bytes)
3. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:41:23 -0800; In my Chilton Manual for TorqueSpecs: Datsun 1961 to 1972, Engine Models: Cylinder heads: Foot Lbs. P: 63-65 E1: 35-45 G: 50-60 J: 45 R: 45-50 U20: 65 L16: 40 L24: 47 A12: 33-35; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00057.html (8,322 bytes)
4. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:54:05 -0800; 1966-1968 RL411 Sedan, 1965-1969 SPL311 1600 Roadster, both use the "R" model Engine, which is the 45-50 lb. cylinder Head torque Specs.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00058.html (8,285 bytes)
5. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: Ronnie Day <ronday@home.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:09:19 -0600; While I can't address the U-20 or R-16 specs I do know that the final torque spec for the L-motors has increased about four times over the 30 plus years that I've been playing with these things. I r; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00065.html (8,440 bytes)
6. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:50:19 -0500; Yep, it's 50 lbs with oil on the threads although you could use more, as I have, w/o any problems. Mike; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00070.html (8,260 bytes)
7. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: SPL311RDST@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:16:20 EST; 50 ft# is right. Thats what I've always used on my 1600. One thing to remember too... the minute you stick anti-sieze on the bolts (wich you SHOULD be doing in a bi-metal engine!) it throws the readi; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00079.html (7,604 bytes)
8. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:23:23 -0800; Laurie I am curious. I assume that you are not a Male, and by the things you write I must also assume that you are the Number 1 Mechanic on your car, right? SHOULD; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00082.html (8,243 bytes)
9. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: The Dread Pirate Roberts <svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:22:11 -0800; Not more torque, more bolt tension. When you reduce the friction between the internal and external threads and between the underside of the head of the fastener and the part being fastened, more of t; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00087.html (8,351 bytes)
10. Re: Got Torque? (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:34:15 -0500; Great article about this in November 2000 issue of Hot Rod. According to the article you have to reduce the torque values by 45% if you use antiseize on the bolts and 40% if you use oil. The manual d; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00091.html (9,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]