Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Government\s+Assault\s+on\s+Daily\s+Polluters\s+$Our\s+Toys\s+\?\?\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Government\s+Assault\s+on\s+Daily\s+Polluters\s+$Our\s+Toys\s+\?\?\?$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:05:28 EST; As someone who has spent his entire career in the environmental feild, it is necessary for me to make a comment. I think that it is important that all of you do voice your opinions to your senators a; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00061.html (9,087 bytes)
2. Re: Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@cstone.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 22:29:33 -0500; While this may be true, it does not take into consideration the total pollution cost of a vehicle. My understanding is that the process of manufacturing a new vehicle creates more pollution than that; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00074.html (8,434 bytes)
3. Re: Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:00:44 -0700; Consider also the miles most of the collector cars are operated per year. Our race cars probably are on the high end of emissions during a race but they are raced but a few hours per year. Yes, ther; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00075.html (10,667 bytes)
4. Re: Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:56:39 -0500; This discussion needs a couple of Devil's Advocates: With all due respect and in full knowledge that FOT is a competition-oriented group, in the context of legislation calling for scrapping old cars,; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00080.html (13,499 bytes)
5. Re: Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: Justin <jmwagner@greenheart.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 20:03:33 -0800; I really have to wonder about such conclusions... If one replaces a Triumph "Daily Commuter" with a new modern lower emission car... How much pollution was created to produce this newer car? If they; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00081.html (11,560 bytes)
6. Re: Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: "Michael D. Porter" <mporter@zianet.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 22:47:16 -0700; I'll try to weigh in on this a bit further than I have previously, since I have feet planted in both worlds--Triumph ownership and environmental concerns. First, the air pollution problem is real, an; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00086.html (14,259 bytes)
7. Re: Government Assault on Daily Polluters (Our Toys ???) (score: 1): Author: Randall <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 23:56:01 -0800; Michael, I beg to differ. I live in the LA smog basin, and can report from first-hand experience that the air quality here is far improved over what it was in the 80's. When I moved here in 1978, 1st; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00088.html (12,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]