Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gridding\s+Standard\s+proposal\s+for\s+SF\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gridding\s+Standard\s+proposal\s+for\s+SF\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Gridding Standard proposal for SF ? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 17:37:56 EST; The problem that I see with it is the 3 and 4 driver cars need a lane, too. If they're in with the 2 driver cars, you can't cycle them as fast as you need to. CHD; /html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00002.html (6,687 bytes)
2. Gridding Standard proposal for SF ? (score: 1): Author: "Escano, Arnold (MP)" <aescano@guidant.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:16:50 -0800; STANDARD? to make it efficient (old/new timers don't have to ask) The multiple Driver Lane(s) must be on the inside part of the GRID (close to trailer) why? less traffic more room for stuff (helmets,; /html/ba-autox/2003-02/msg00308.html (7,075 bytes)
3. RE: Gridding Standard proposal for SF ? (score: 1): Author: "Bryan Nemy" <bnemy@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:58:32 -0800; Good idea. We should be consistent for all events if possible. Bryan STANDARD? to make it efficient (old/new timers don't have to ask) The multiple Driver Lane(s) must be on the inside part of the G; /html/ba-autox/2003-02/msg00316.html (7,383 bytes)
4. RE: Gridding Standard proposal for SF ? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:06:35 -0800 (PST); Only caveat I can think of is that if the multiple-driver lane is on the inside, you often can't easily route rerun cars into it. As long as there's room to send the rerun cars up separately to the o; /html/ba-autox/2003-02/msg00318.html (8,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]