Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HC\s+vs\.\s+LC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HC\s+vs\.\s+LC\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 12:37:30 -0700; The main difference between the HC and LC engines is in the pistons. The LC pistons have quite a dip or depression. There are other differences that come into play in the 18V engine series but that w; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00926.html (7,921 bytes)
2. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:16:34 -0800; When I rebuilt the engine for my '77, using HC pistons, the results were so good that the depression cleared up completely and I'm now downright happy ............... (SNIP) pistons. The depression w; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00946.html (7,616 bytes)
3. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:25:32 -0600; The last time I bought B pistons I used Repco. These were forged 4-ring as I recall. Seems like they were made in Australia or NZ. Maybe Niel recognizes the brand name. CR; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00950.html (7,157 bytes)
4. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: Chris Chandler <spawn@net-link.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 23:21:29 -0500; What's the tradeoff to going to HC pistons from regular? Is there any? I'm about to buy pistons and I'm not sure which would be better suited for me. Thanks! -- Chris Chandler '72 B Roadster "The Red; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00958.html (7,375 bytes)
5. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 08:18:33 -0800; Increased compression equals more horsepower. The only thing to watch out for is whether your cylinder head has been excessively milled over the years. During a valve job, the machine shop always mil; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00973.html (8,524 bytes)
6. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:22:54 -0600; Tradeoffs when using HC pistons: More power but you might have to use higher octane gas if it pings. It's unlikely, but if your head has ever been shaved (the one on the engine (G)) I suppose it cou; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00983.html (7,185 bytes)
7. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 01:01:06 EST; Does the name "Repco-Brabham" strike a cord with any F1 fans?; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg01026.html (7,367 bytes)
8. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@iamerica.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 11:16:40 -0600; Isn't there a separate list for old farts?; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg01044.html (7,592 bytes)
9. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 19:00:04 EST; And I'm a charter member :>) Rick Morrison (older than his cars combined) 72 MGBGT 74 Midget; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg01068.html (7,905 bytes)
10. re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: Neil Cotty <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>; Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 11:56:44 -0800; Of course <G> Sir Jack Brabham and his many world championships - there's an excellent Website you may want to take a look at: http://www.ddavid.com/formula1/brab.htm Also mentions my favorite Kiwi'; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg01071.html (7,596 bytes)
11. Re: HC vs. LC (score: 1): Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@iamerica.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 20:55:05 -0600; I know. I signed the charter meself. John; /html/mgs/1998-12/msg01074.html (8,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]