Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HIF4\s+or\s+HS4\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HIF4\s+or\s+HS4\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. HIF4 or HS4? (score: 1): Author: Agustin de la Calle <delacall@bcmp.med.harvard.edu>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 14:48:30 -0500 (EST); Dear SOLers, (I think we still are, even here) Can anybody say if there is an obvious reason why one should prefer either the HS4 over the HIF4 SU carb or vice versa? Does the position of the float b; /html/mgs/1995-03/msg00063.html (7,075 bytes)
2. Re: HIF4 or HS4? (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 15:11:41 -0500 (EST); HIF4 Pros: Temperature Compensation, less plumbing to leak, adjust with screwdriver. Spring-loaded self-centering metering needle. HIF4 Cons: Have to remove carb to work on float, bowl, or float need; /html/mgs/1995-03/msg00065.html (7,982 bytes)
3. Re: HIF4 or HS4? (score: 1): Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring); Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 15:34:10 +0500; Gus asks: I would guess aluminum is better. Will "what, Me typo?" Zehring; /html/mgs/1995-03/msg00066.html (6,604 bytes)
4. Re: HIF4 or HS4? (score: 1): Author: Joanne Hershfield / Jim Fink <hershfld@email.unc.edu>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:17:19 -0500 (EST); Here-Here.... Likewise, my '71MGB has Orig, HS4's and they are great now that they are rebuilt...., Pros And Cons. still very valid....though.. My '69 MGB is currently running the HIF4's off my Ex-'; /html/mgs/1995-03/msg00081.html (7,365 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]