Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HIF44\'s\s+$AKA\s+HIF6\'s$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HIF44\'s\s+$AKA\s+HIF6\'s$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. HIF44's (AKA HIF6's) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lapham" <Dave_Lapham@oakqm3.sps.mot.com>; Date: 27 Jun 1994 16:42:25 U; Okay, but what makes the HIF44 or HIF6 or whatever so good? Why is it better than a HS6 or HD6? I'm not being smart, just the opposite, and enquiring minds want to know. I don't need (and hopefully; /html/british-cars/1994-06/msg00838.html (7,119 bytes)
2. Re: HIF44's (AKA HIF6's) (score: 1): Author: Randy Wilson <randy@taylor.infi.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Jun 1994 22:42:31 -0400 (EDT); According to David Vizard's "Tuning BL's A-Series Engine", the HIF carbs flow better. Specificly, he lists 240 cfm for a HIF6, 210 cfm for a HS6. A major complaint with H, HD, and HS carbs is worn t; /html/british-cars/1994-06/msg00845.html (8,417 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]