Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HP\,\s+sort\s+of\.$non\-Tiger$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HP\,\s+sort\s+of\.$non\-Tiger$\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 21:50:12 -0400; Just got back from a trip to Bolder. I took the Gtec-Pro meter along on the trip as I didn't want to leave it in my Tiger at the airport parking lot. Well I got one of those "super powered" Hertz Fo; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00157.html (7,864 bytes)
2. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: "Tom Oxner" <TOxner@mail.uca.edu>; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 21:24:55 -0600; This must have been a Lotus 7 version of the Contour :). I would have guessed that the Contour would weigh at least twice that. Just teasing a little. Tom Oxner With 5 wide open blasts on flat; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00159.html (8,535 bytes)
3. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 08:46:38 EDT; << Just got back from a trip to Bolder. I took the Gtec-Pro meter along on the trip as I didn't want to leave it in my Tiger at the airport parking lot. Well I got one of those "super powered" Hertz; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00161.html (7,515 bytes)
4. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 17:49:48 -0400; The range in the book was actually 1385 to 1440 lbs. I guess the tin can metal and plastic that new cars are made of weigh a lost less than the boilerplate bodies of old England. James Barrett Tiger; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00190.html (7,736 bytes)
5. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 15:01:52 -0700; I was skeptical of that weight too. Would be less than half what my Taurus weighs. Is it possible you were looking at weight range figures in kilograms rather than pounds? Bob Robert L. Palmer Dept.; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00191.html (8,169 bytes)
6. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 18:35:10 -0400; Bob, Now that is possible. If so then the HP reading would be 2.52 X 39 = 98 HP. However, they did not use KWhr in place of HP. Of course I previously had an 83 Mustang that had both metric and US bo; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00193.html (7,746 bytes)
7. RE: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <TSmit@novatel.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:35:50 -0600; Hi all, http://carpoint.msn.com/vip/Ford/Contour gives the curb weight as 2603 to 3129 lbs, which is 1183 to 1422 kg. Oddly enough, the SVT is the pig of the bunch (350 lbs heavier than the SE). So m; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00194.html (8,491 bytes)
8. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:32:44 -0700; Now this is really hilarious. Didn't realize you had such a fine honed sense of humor Jim. Pardon me while I climb back into my chair. Now then, I'm sure we all believe that, at least compared with; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00195.html (8,556 bytes)
9. Re: HP, sort of.(non-Tiger) (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 18:12:37 -0400; Sorry, had a rough day, thinking cm to inches or was that mm to fortnights? You are correct, therefore the HP would max at 39X 2.205= 86. Still a slug! James Barrett Tiger II 351C and others; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00215.html (7,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]