Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Header\s+Rail\s+Seal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Header\s+Rail\s+Seal\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Header Rail Seal (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:00:58 +0100; Got a new one of these and immediately noticed that the two 'bumps' that press down onto the top of the screen frame, when the seal is viewed end-on, are not symmetrical with the body of the seal. On; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00062.html (7,494 bytes)
2. Re: Header Rail Seal (score: 1): Author: <mjanacek@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:39:02 -0400; Mine are installed the same as your *original* was, that is with the larger bump to the rear on both my soft and hard tops. Never had any problem latching/water sealing with either one although what; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00063.html (8,512 bytes)
3. Re: Header Rail Seal (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:27:39 +0100; Thanks for your comments on orientation. We have a 3-day run this weekend, and after a warm and sunny two weeks the forecast is 'unsettled', so I may well have the opportunity to find out the effecti; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00068.html (7,920 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]