Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Help\s+w\/Rover\s+3\.9\s+piston\s+choices\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 10:57:13 -0400
Okay, my turn. :) For those running Rover 3.9s, what pistons are you using? I have a '89 3.9 Rover engine with a 8.13:1 comp. ratio. I would much prefer 10 to 10.5:1. What is the best way to achieve
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00001.html (7,566 bytes)

2. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: "James J." <m1garand@speakeasy.net>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 12:19:43 -0400
I stroked my 3.9 w/a 300 crank and used the Ford 255 pistons (cast). You'll probably have to get your cylinders honed a little and order the pistons oversized. D&D carries them, and they can probabl
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00002.html (8,089 bytes)

3. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 17:22:20 -0700
James, I have seen this build formula several times and in several places over the years. What I haven't seen is specific information on the need (or lack of need) for milling of piston head and/or
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00004.html (8,070 bytes)

4. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: "James J." <m1garand@speakeasy.net>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 21:25:58 -0400
W/out any machining, the C/R is about 10.4, which is fine w/pump gas and aluminum heads. A thicker gasket will lower that some. As far as I know, no machining is required to pistons or head to make
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00005.html (9,184 bytes)

5. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:39:44 -0700
James et all, A 10.4 to 1 C R is all fine to talk about, but how does one stop the dieseling after shutoff when using carburetors???? I have several cast iron engines (Volvo & Morris) with CR of abo
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00006.html (9,833 bytes)

6. RE: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: <trevor_easton@dofasco.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 06:46:54 -0400
James et all, A 10.4 to 1 C R is all fine to talk about, but how does one stop the dieseling after shutoff when using carburetors???? My worry would not be so much dieseling as the preignition and su
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00007.html (7,617 bytes)

7. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: Greg A Myer <motorhead45@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:54:48 -0400
Trevor is right. Preignition can be a very serious problem with higher compression ratios and less than adequate octane levels. I've rebuilt engines that needed pistons because of this. Several Ford
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00008.html (10,447 bytes)

8. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1)
Author: Kent Christensen <lkchris@osogrande.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:23:44 -0600
While indeed your 1989 NA Range Rover has 8.13 compression, later 3.9s in both Range Rovers and Discoveries had 9.35 - 1 compression. /// /// buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00009.html (7,331 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu