Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Help\s+with\s+a\s+car\s+class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Help\s+with\s+a\s+car\s+class\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Help with a car class (score: 1): Author: Don Miller <turbospl311@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 13:04:40 -0700 (PDT); There is a debate going amongst a few of us about the proper classing of this car. 1970 911 listed in rule book in A-Stock Okay, say he has bolted in new 2.7 litre motor (came with 2.2). Now should t; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00672.html (6,880 bytes)
2. Re: Help with a car class (score: 1): Author: "Walter Fooshee" <WALTER@inacompnet.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:52:05 -0500; "Stock" means as delivered by the factory. An engine swap is definitely NOT stock, unless that very same engine was available on that very same chassis in that very same model year (no up- or back-da; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00678.html (7,044 bytes)
3. Re: Help with a car class (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:54:55 -0500; classing That makes him ASP. Update/backdate is not allowed in Stock. Doesn't matter. If he has a later car with a larger motor that was available from the manufacturer in that later model, that's le; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00679.html (7,217 bytes)
4. Re: Help with a car class (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:35:56 -0500; The generic answer is no, swapping an engine to anything other than what came in the car from the factory is not stock legal. (that would be an SP thing... if the new engine hasn't been "built") Howe; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00747.html (7,888 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]