Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hemi\s+vs\s+Ford\s+\&\s+Chev\s+Controversy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hemi\s+vs\s+Ford\s+\&\s+Chev\s+Controversy\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:40:45 -0600; Add one more hemi engine to the list: the SOHC 3- liter 128F Ferrari engine. It has hemi heads and they must flow pretty well although I have no data other than the fact that it put out 240BHP from; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00036.html (8,816 bytes)
2. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 12:16:33 -0500; I would suspect they 'tolerate' the ignition advance because the design is so poor thermally.. It is not the sign of a good design, it is the characteristic of a poor one though. As the combustion ch; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00038.html (10,216 bytes)
3. RE: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:43:34 -0600; I stand corrected on the more/less advance topic. As regards the 2- liter Honda having more power than the 3- liter 128F Ferrari engine, well......the Ferrari V-12 was doing this way back in 1962 (w; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00074.html (10,002 bytes)
4. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:16:47 EST; My Honda has 200,000 miles on it, my Ferrari is a model, on my shelf! No comparison! Jack /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/li; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00088.html (7,610 bytes)
5. RE: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:00:52 -0600; I sold my Ferrari and my Honda is a 5kW generator. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ --Original Message-- From: Nt788@aol.com [mailto:Nt788@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:17 AM To: Albaugh, Nei; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00090.html (8,200 bytes)
6. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:37:09 -0800 (PST); Fact of the matter is, the Chrylser hemis only like around 28 - 35 degrees, until fuel loads get above 80% Nitro. Once you get up that high in nitro, then they like 55-70 degrees. When you get that; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00098.html (8,398 bytes)
7. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:23:51 -0800 (PST); Hee hee hee. I can identify with that. Nt788@aol.com wrote: My Honda has 200,000 miles on it, my Ferrari is a model, on my shelf! No comparison! Jack /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majord; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00103.html (7,845 bytes)
8. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "john backus" <34ford@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:28:22 -0000; Dick, BBC engines on 98% nitro like 50 or 60 degrees of advance too. John Fact of the matter is, the Chrylser hemis only like around 28 - 35 degrees, until fuel loads get above 80% Nitro. Once you ge; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00112.html (8,722 bytes)
9. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 08:43:34 -0600; Hi Dick, On the advance issue, high spark advance numbers required for nitro (and alky) are the result of slower burn rates (flame front). You must start the fire burning earlier in the combustion cy; /html/land-speed/2002-01/msg00117.html (9,444 bytes)
10. Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 11:33:13 -0800 (PST); I'm not so sure you would make more HP. I am currently running a SBC because they are plentiful and easy to run. Dollar for dollar, they will give the cheapest horses! HP in any motor though, as you; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00745.html (9,090 bytes)
11. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 15:25:35 -0800; Heck, Dick...wanna buy my car? Then you could do it yourself and have the fastest DeSoto hemi powered Sunbeam on the planet. The only one, in fact. Is your horse power comparison made using the Desot; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00749.html (10,090 bytes)
12. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 15:25:41 -0800 (PST); I was comparing flow numbers for heads. And I compared a 270 Desoto to a 289 Ford; a 300 Chrylser with Hemi heads to a 305 Ford; a 354 Chrysler to a 350 Chev. No Apples to Oranges here. Of Course, I'; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00750.html (8,488 bytes)
13. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 15:46:17 -0800; Add Nitro, 20 deg. more lead and overdrive the blower 40% and hang on. PS, keep it away from Keith Glen -- Original Message -- From: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com> To: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; "; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00751.html (9,294 bytes)
14. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 21:02:09 EST; I don't know if my little Ardun hemi is relevant to this discussion, but my experience has been that the hemi is "so-so" on normally aspirated gas and alky, wakes up a lot when some nitro is added,; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00756.html (8,886 bytes)
15. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:59:46 -0800; Yep, not a DeSoto hemi in the lot. Nor any Chrysler. Most are after market built by Keith Black, Fontana, and custom jobs. They are not at all like tthe old hemis, are they? None in prostock? None in; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00758.html (9,247 bytes)
16. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 02:56:15 EST; Mayf, My point was to simply share what we were doing with a hemi that's considered to be the grandfather of moderm hemi's, not to get into a debate with some rail-bird that would rather argue than b; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00760.html (8,893 bytes)
17. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 08:18:26 -0500; so why not publish the flow numbers you got and compared for everyone? don't forget to list the pressure they were tested at and what model head with valve sizes.. Dave /// /// land-speed@autox.team.; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00763.html (10,362 bytes)
18. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "john backus" <34ford@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 11:26:31 -0000; Dr. Mayfield, are you saying that the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes are not running Hemi's? I need a definition for the same reason you do. To increase my knowledge of things that I mistakenly thoug; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00768.html (9,846 bytes)
19. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 13:44:44 EST; The new 357 Chrysler hemi makes 350hp, oversquare with zero overlap @.050. two plugs and different valve angle. on pump gas! jack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe sen; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00773.html (8,538 bytes)
20. Re: Hemi vs Ford & Chev Controversy (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 10:52:59 -0800; Absolutely NOT what I said. The original thoughts were from Dick and he = mentioned putting a DeSoto hemi into my little car. Told him I was a = ford man, but fond of hemis. Then he made some compari; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00774.html (10,140 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]