Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Herald\s+1147cc\s+engine\s+history\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Herald 1147cc engine history? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:55:22 -0600
I'm trying to understand the production history of the 1147cc Herald engine but I'm running into incomplete and conflicting information. Can anyone shed some light on this? Here's what I know: The 11
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00230.html (8,063 bytes)

2. Re: Herald 1147cc engine history? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:15:10 -0000 g16LIWu09812
-- Original Message -- From Erik Quackenbush <erik at midwestfilter.com> This is where the difference lies. The early Herald 1147 unit had a camshaft with 12-52-52-12 timing, whereas the 12/50 unit u
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00245.html (10,378 bytes)

3. Re: Herald 1147cc engine history? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:03:21 EST
Just to add to/clarify this a wee bit. Bill's statement is basically correct, but it depends on one's definition of "earliest US export 1200s"! From what I've seen over the years of original cars, it
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00264.html (8,375 bytes)

4. Re: Herald 1147cc engine history? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 23:34:44 -0500
OK, but what about the GA...HE series, such as GA41811HE. Is that just a marketing gimmick, or were some pre-'64 engines higher than 8.0:1, or were there engines without the HE suffix having even low
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00265.html (9,510 bytes)

5. Re: Herald 1147cc engine history? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:43:55 -0000 g17Aqau02448
-- Original Message -- From Bill Kelly <bk54 at erols.com> Hi Bill, 8.0:1 was considered (in relative terms) the High compression Engine and this is what the HE suffix refers to - the later 8.5:1 eng
/html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00268.html (8,307 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu