Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hi\s+Torque\s+Starter\s+follow\-up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hi\s+Torque\s+Starter\s+follow\-up\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Hi Torque Starter follow-up (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <max_heim@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:57:59 -0700; Sounds good. I have to admit I'm one of those who questioned the need for a "high torque" starter, though. The early, high compression B engine scarcely seems to require any starter action whatsoever; /html/mgs/2006-06/msg00104.html (8,491 bytes)
2. Hi Torque Starter follow-up (score: 1): Author: Phil Bates <jello@ida.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:35:56 -0600; I received the high torque starter today. Installation is fairly straightforward, but there are some things one should know. First - if you don't already know this - you must remove your hanging oil; /html/mgs/2006-06/msg00105.html (7,735 bytes)
3. Re: Hi Torque Starter follow-up (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:44:35 +0100; Not so much 'need', as 'benefit'. Even on a later car with pre-engaged starter as standard the benefits are easier starting especially under adverse conditions and less load on the battery, extending; /html/mgs/2006-06/msg00111.html (6,903 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]