Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*How\s+accurate\s+are\s+our\s+timers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*How\s+accurate\s+are\s+our\s+timers\?\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:48:00 -0400; I think the timers we have --JA Circuits--are outstanding. At a recent event I matched my time down to the .001 of a second. I'd never done that before, not even when we had the Manzanita three chann; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00007.html (8,640 bytes)
2. How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:55:50 -0400; Message text written by "Richard Urschel" "So, does anyone know if our timing systems confirm a double trip at the start and finish or do they just accept what they get while rejecting any additional; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00008.html (8,314 bytes)
3. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:57:47 -0400; Message text written by "John J. Stimson-III" " I think that the best way to ensure a reliable trigger is to be careful when aligning the lights, try not to point either box generally towards the ris; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00010.html (8,028 bytes)
4. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Ms Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 18:09:22 -0700 (PDT); If the timers are not accurate, then how do you know that you're within .1 in 25 or any amount of runs? They could be wrong on every run. -Katie; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00013.html (7,960 bytes)
5. RE: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <rbrown7@covad.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:13:14 -0700; Ok, I'll bite. For all you tech types here are some of the sources of timing errors. I'm sure this list can come up with others: 1. Variations on what part of the car trips the lights. 2. Variable tr; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00018.html (10,250 bytes)
6. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:23:15 -0700; Polling? Really? Quelle declasse. Barely matters how accurate it is, what's the precision? ;) KeS; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00019.html (8,224 bytes)
7. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Urschel" <osp13@mybluelight.com>; Date: 2 Jun 2004 05:55:39 -0000; On Sat, 29 May 2004 18:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Ms Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com> First, let me point out a couple of things. I did not claim nor agrue that the timers are, in fact, inaccurate. I asked h; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00023.html (9,559 bytes)
8. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Stephen Bowlus <chezbowlus@goldrush.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 07:11:20 -0700; You should talk to your friendly neighborhood statistician, but here are my $.02: By "reproduce within a tenth" let's say you mean "the standard deviation from the average is +/- 0.1 sec". That would; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00026.html (9,388 bytes)
9. RE: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:28:04 -0400; Message text written by "Rick Brown" "Ok, I'll bite. For all you tech types here are some of the sources of timing errors. I'm sure this list can come up with others: 1. Variations on what part of th; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00029.html (9,787 bytes)
10. RE: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: <rbrown7@covad.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:11:43 -0000; I used to use run-length limited codes also in the disk biz also. A further advance in detection technology came about starting about 5 years ago with partial response channels. One is called "PRML"; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00030.html (9,777 bytes)
11. RE: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Steffan Thomas <duomaxwell@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:53:00 -0700 (GMT-07:00); www ieee-uffc org/freqcontrol/quartz/vig/vigcateg htm (add your own periods) A crystal unit's resonance frequency varies with temperature. Typical frequency vs. temperature (f vs. T) characteristics; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00031.html (9,092 bytes)
12. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:03:05 -0400; Message text written by Stephen Bowlus " butterflies in South America)." -- End Original Message -- This task should be assigned to the SEB so they will spend all their time on it rather than mucking; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00033.html (7,953 bytes)
13. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "John A. Carriere" <jacarriere@jacircuits.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 06:39:11 -0400; Let me see if I can help answer Richard's question. I've been out fo the country for a few weeks and am now catching up on my email. It has been interesting reading the discussions in this thread. Th; /html/ba-autox/2004-06/msg00073.html (10,569 bytes)
14. How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Urschel" <osp13@mybluelight.com>; Date: 28 May 2004 19:03:06 -0000; How accurate are our timers? Having made no changes to my car for the past 18 months, and having concentrated exclusively on driving during that period, I have finally developed a consistent ability; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00111.html (8,248 bytes)
15. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:39:07 -0700; I don't know the answer to how our timer handles multiple trips, but I wonder: Is the beam low enough to pass under your Elan? I'm not even sure it would pass under my Miata. My guess would be that t; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00112.html (8,580 bytes)
16. Fwd: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 13:33:58 -0700; I frequently misunderstand you, Rich, so let me check my understanding: - Your premise is that in about 1 of 25 runs, either the start sensor or finish sensor fails to pick up the front wheel and get; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00113.html (10,368 bytes)
17. RE: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <rbrown7@covad.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 14:12:46 -0700; Try running an experiment: Run a strip of reflectorized tape down the side of each rocker panel and see if it become completely invisable to the timing system. <g> -- Rick Brown; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00114.html (11,522 bytes)
18. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 14:22:56 -0700; Back in the days of Yore... Either Cycle or Cycle World magazine used to pick a bike of the year, and they'd send one off to be totally chromed, then photograph it for the cover. One reader wrote in; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00115.html (7,638 bytes)
19. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Urschel" <osp13@mybluelight.com>; Date: 28 May 2004 21:40:34 -0000; The only thing you missed is the "within a tenth", so of the three tenths I was saying two tenths might be caused by the cell triggering on the rear wheels. Wheelbase is 84". At 25 mph that is .19 s; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00116.html (11,217 bytes)
20. Re: How accurate are our timers? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:35:31 -0400; Yes, but in this case, your timing is off by nearly 2 months, because this HAS to be a poorly timed April Fool's joke. that being the case, the whole concept of you being a reliable source is skewed,; /html/ba-autox/2004-05/msg00117.html (6,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]