Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*I\s+would\s+be\s+more\s+concerned\s+about\s+what\s+is\s+under\s+louvered\s+hood\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*I\s+would\s+be\s+more\s+concerned\s+about\s+what\s+is\s+under\s+louvered\s+hood\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. I would be more concerned about what is under louvered hood (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:23:41 EST; Given all the post 1972 stuff used on vintage racecars, I sincerely doubt that someone is going to make an issue out of a louvered hood. However I do think it would be great to compile documentation; /html/fot/2001-01/msg00079.html (6,802 bytes)
2. RE: I would be more concerned about what is under louvered hood (score: 1): Author: "R. Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 8:24:42 -0800; I raced Triumphs ( all types) up through 1954 thru 1972 and never saw a car raced in the production category with louvers in the hood ( or other places). Jacking up the rear of the hood hinges was ab; /html/fot/2001-01/msg00090.html (7,662 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]