Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IMPORTANT\:Possible\s+Salt\s+Flats\s+Issue\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:40:43 -0500
Now this is a scary thought. Anybody know anything more? John Beckett -- Original Message -- From: "Marsha Terry" <mterry@enol.com> To: <usfra@saltflats.com>; <salt@ivic.net>; <ofice@scta-bni.org>; <
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00396.html (11,317 bytes)

2. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:52:20 -0800 (PST)
That IS scary John!!! We had better get ECTA, USFRA and SCTI/BNI all on the same sheet of music on this matter. Is there a salt racer/list member who is a lawyer and lives in Utah? Burying our head i
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00397.html (13,261 bytes)

3. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:25:23 -0700
Save the Salt board needs this asap if they already do not have wind of it. That group has been working with the BLM for some time, and has legal assistance, of which we all contribute to. I believe
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00398.html (14,995 bytes)

4. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: ardunbill@webtv.net
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:40:44 -0500 (EST)
John and Group, just as sure as you're born this is just another non-issue, foolish agitation from somebody about some hobgoblin. Sure, there are environmental groups, sure they can hire lawyers to g
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00399.html (9,344 bytes)

5. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:43:42 -0800 (PST)
No, Joe, it would Never -won't ever happen. If you really think it would, then take my advice and don't buy that machine that turns lead into gold! Seriously, this brand of group would never align w
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00400.html (8,961 bytes)

6. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Don Kerr <dkveuro@pop.flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:14:01 -0600
Scary.? Yes. Inevitable continuation of erosion of individual
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00403.html (12,485 bytes)

7. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Don Kerr <dkveuro@pop.flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:16:30 -0600
Don't the mining interests also get impacted in this ? --
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00404.html (14,829 bytes)

8. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Don Kerr <dkveuro@pop.flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:32:33 -0600
Hi folk...... Don't wanna be Chicken Little, but below is the sort of response the logging companies had, also see what happened to the Spotted Owl territory, the big Redwood tree issue, the Gun Cont
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00405.html (10,720 bytes)

9. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: "Beverly C. Stanley" <beverlycst@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:00:02 -0800
The Save the Salt folks have a pretty good lawyer in Salt Lake City who could probably head off any problems we might have - Save the Salt is a really good combine of the land speed organizations, al
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00407.html (15,260 bytes)

10. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: JERRY FOSTER <fosterap@flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:18:41 -0600
Let's keep this "environmental" stuff in mind when we vote in November...Jerry in Dallas
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00409.html (12,939 bytes)

11. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:40:02 -0700
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00411.html (9,852 bytes)

12. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:28:59 -0600
Jerry I totally agree..... I don't get into Politics here other then that of the Land speed Racing Community and that is only when I am dragged into it. But each of us has a Responsibility to Vote to
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00412.html (13,995 bytes)

13. RE: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Christensen" <ron.christensen@wsapr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:58:24 -0700
This latest environmental concern from SUWA sounds a lot like the e-mail tax thing . . . something to get us all riled up. I don't think anything will come of it. We don't have too many little furry
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00422.html (8,381 bytes)

14. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Wester S Potter <wspotter@jps.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 07:41:44 -0700
I think Save the Salt Coalition and all concerned who are on the board have a good relationship with the BLM and Reilly Industries (who is paying for the pumping) and have one of the most active leg
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00432.html (11,512 bytes)

15. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: "\"LandSpeed\" Louise Ann Noeth" <lanspeed@west.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:40:11 -0800
Has Pruett been informed of this latest development? I have spoken to the BLM and have placed a call to Bloch at SUWA to try to discover his intentions. Additionally, my colleagues in the media (abo
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00436.html (12,986 bytes)

16. Re: IMPORTANT:Possible Salt Flats Issue (score: 1)
Author: Ed Van Scoy <edvs@idt.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:05:46 -0700
Didn't I read in Louise's book that the area used for LSR is checkerboarded with private deeded tracts? "Course private land can be taken "for the public good..............) Ed
/html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00439.html (11,961 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu