Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ignition\s+Timing\s+For\s+Performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ignition\s+Timing\s+For\s+Performance\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Ignition Timing For Performance (score: 1): Author: "Christian, Skip" <ChristianWL@navair.navy.mil>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:14:09 -0400; I have a 1974 B and would like to have it perform like a '62 - '67 car (the only hindrance would be my stock 8:1 compression). Does anyone know what specs to use (for centrifugal & vacuum advance) fo; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00585.html (7,464 bytes)
2. Re: Ignition Timing For Performance (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:12:16 -0500; If you engine is all original then you have the vac advance unit to match the vacuum source it already has. If you switched to ported vacuum then you'd need the appropriate dizzy/vac unit. Leave thin; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00598.html (8,007 bytes)
3. Re: Ignition Timing For Performance (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:50:40 +0100; Whether ported or manifold vacuum is immaterial off-idle, other than that the distributor serial No. i.e. centrifugal and vacuum curves were chosen to match the rest of the engine specs although emis; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00607.html (7,670 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]