- 1. Re: In-car camera mount (score: 1)
- Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 00:56:50 +1030
- OK, once again thanks to those who responded (mostly off-list) to this plea. I think I just about have it right - and it simply cost me a few brain cells; $2 worth of heavy, galvanised plate; and for
- /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00052.html (8,201 bytes)
- 2. Re: In-car camera mount (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Wood" <dwood143@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:40:02 -0700
- You're right, it does take a long time to download, but the movie is pretty steady and it appears to be the right height above the windshield as it shows the road ahead very well. The only problem i
- /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00055.html (8,754 bytes)
- 3. Re: In-car camera mount (score: 1)
- Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 20:17:48 +1030
- I have made the file considerably smaller :-) But I couldn't make it look like I was driving on the LEFT (not RIGHT) side of the road! It even calmed the audio down a bit - does my car really sound l
- /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00061.html (7,480 bytes)
- 4. In-car camera mount (score: 1)
- Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:38:15 +1030
- I have mentioned it before - but now I need to get SERIOUS. I picked up a nice little Hi-8 camera (SONY CCD-TRV46E) at a good price (everyone else is going digital) and I really, really need to desi
- /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00434.html (8,648 bytes)
- 5. Re: In-car camera mount (score: 1)
- Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:58:51 +1030
- Thanks for the on and off list replies guys - lots of useful info. I have seen the IOPORT website and I had my concerns, but personal recommendation does it for me. I am still building my own but it
- /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00448.html (7,864 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu