Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*In\s+2006\.\.\.\(Re\:\s+In\s+1951\.\.\.\.\.\.\)\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:46:10 -0800 (PST)
This is a bit long, but stay with it, somehow it fits with a country's industry going down the tubes. I spent a portion of my day dealing with something called "The Specialty Metals Clause" of the "B
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00147.html (10,455 bytes)

2. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:31:41 -0600
Honestly, Ron. You are such a whiner! Cheers!! Jim - he of the static Midget in Dodge City -- 1964 R60/2 1968 MG Midget 1976 R90/6 1990 K100LT **Don't underestimate the power of stupid people in larg
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00156.html (8,408 bytes)

3. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Yeah, me and the 10 people or so we'll have to lay off, not to mention the trickle down effect on our subcontractors when we outsource overseas.... Jim Johnson <bmwwxman@gmail.com> wrote: Honestly, R
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00159.html (8,711 bytes)

4. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:47:47 -0600
Be reasonable, Ron. We'll never become a true Socialist Nirvanah without making a few sacrifices. It's your turn to pony up for the cause, comrade! I just hope that when we finally finish turning our
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00162.html (9,135 bytes)

5. RE: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 06:48:43 -0600
I think you ought to forward that letter to your senator & congressman.... --Original Message-- From owner-spridgets at autox.team.net [mailto:owner-spridgets@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Ron Soave S
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00167.html (8,800 bytes)

6. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:03:27 -0500
It's they who made those laws. A friend who works at Sikorsky Aircraft has explained to me in the past that it is the lawmakers that created the $1,000 hammer. Another who works for a large elevator
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00168.html (10,300 bytes)

7. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:11:00 -0600
Please stop badmouthing mother China. They have no intention of giving us anything as we all work for the collective. Remember, after we gave them the military secrets, the technology, the Brits gave
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00169.html (9,743 bytes)

8. RE: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:36:04 -0600
Then ya write the newspapers....and the tv networks. (and of course, you retire, because your company will can your ass) It's they who made those laws. A friend who works at Sikorsky Aircraft has exp
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00170.html (9,486 bytes)

9. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:03:55 GMT
"Be reasonable, Ron" You are sooo right, Jim Johnson...."The Enemy Within"....I cannot believe the way our country has gone over the last 30+ years or so. So glad I'm older and on the downside in thi
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00171.html (8,493 bytes)

10. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:21:54 -0800
And do it quick, before he gets indicted. BZ
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00174.html (8,770 bytes)

11. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:38:24 EST
Another who works for a large elevator company has explained to me that any government work is multiple times more expensive due to the specifications unique to government work. He used the example t
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00175.html (9,517 bytes)

12. RE: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:49:12 -0600
So are we Bob. --Original Message-- From owner-spridgets at autox.team.net [mailto:owner-spridgets@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Robert E. Shlafer Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:04 AM To: Jim John
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00181.html (9,247 bytes)

13. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:51:02 -0600
oh, and include, "HAPPY NEW YEAR from a voter"
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00182.html (9,347 bytes)

14. RE: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:23:22 GMT
"So are we, Bob" Nah...I'll outlive you, easy. :) Cap'n. Bob '60 :{)
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00183.html (8,355 bytes)

15. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:02:29 GMT
"And do it quick...."...very funny, Billy!! :):) ...but you ain't kiddin'. And there is no way any of these charletons is gonna vote for a meaningful campaign finance reform bill to the extent requir
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00186.html (8,727 bytes)

16. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:33:52 -0800
Maybe we could hire Jack Abramoff to plead our case. BZ
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00187.html (8,403 bytes)

17. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:46:50 GMT
LOL....yeh, Billy. "Honest Abe" should be out in about 10yrs or so. eh? :) Cap'n. Bob '60 :{)
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00188.html (8,150 bytes)

18. Re: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 18:38:00 EST
Maybe we could hire Jack Abramoff to plead our case. BZ I'm sure he could use the $ Robert Houston Texan in New Mexico 73 Midget 63 TR4 74.5 MGBGT Deck us all with Boston Charlie, Walla Walla, Wash,
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00196.html (8,104 bytes)

19. RE: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:52:56 -0800 (PST)
LMAO. Actually, the law goes back to the 1930's (the Berry Act), it was a poor attempt to augment the US steel industry before they believed any other country could make anything. Same sh!, different
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00197.html (9,046 bytes)

20. RE: In 2006...(Re: In 1951......) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:40:45 GMT
"Back when you were a wee kid" Sure....except "the problem" has gotten progressively worse over time. Which is what Ike tried to warn us about in his exit speech back in (I think) '54. Cap'n. Bob '60
/html/spridgets/2006-01/msg00211.html (7,769 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu