Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Incorrect\s+bumper\s+versatility\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Incorrect\s+bumper\s+versatility\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Incorrect bumper versatility (score: 1): Author: "Dale Gleason" <inaverysmallroom@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:46:07 -0500; ....I have a line on a great deal for a 60's Sprite/Midget front bumper... I would like to put in on my bumperless 74 Midget but asides from having to listen to the "correctness" cops I was really co; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00002.html (6,814 bytes)
2. Re: Incorrect bumper versatility (score: 1): Author: type79@ix.netcom.com; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:30:09 -0400 (EDT); You can cetainly mount it if you prefer the big bumpers to the thin style used on the Leyland cars. And of course, it won't match the rear bumpers. jay fishbein wallingford, ct --Original Message--; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00007.html (7,139 bytes)
3. Re: Incorrect bumper versatility (score: 1): Author: "conan" <conan@intrex.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 01:01:15 -0400; I thought '74 was the last year for the chrome (though maybe with rubber strip?) bumpers? In which case the '60s type should be a bolt-on? Ed in NC (I may still have a pair of '70-72 bumpers out bac; /html/spridgets/2006-10/msg00046.html (6,817 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]