Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Installing\s+Roller\s+Rockers\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Installing Roller Rockers (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Ciaffone <chuckc@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:59:51 -0400
Hey Gang, Just now installing a set of "hi lift" roller rockers I got when I visited Min-Mania a week or so ago. The instructions say to gap the rockers at 3 thou over standard. I've set the gap at .
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00636.html (7,484 bytes)

2. Re: Installing Roller Rockers (score: 1)
Author: "shawn tobin" <suhs2@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:21:04 CDT
More parts means more noise, right? Notice any performance gains?
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00638.html (7,243 bytes)

3. Re: Installing Roller Rockers (score: 1)
Author: Michael D Myers <mdmyers_ct@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:09:44 -0400
I think you have a typo in your clearances. According to Vizard's book, a stock cam should have .012" clearance at the valve tip with a 1.25:1 rocker ratio, .015" with a 1.5:1 rocker ratio. If your r
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00640.html (8,408 bytes)

4. Re: Installing Roller Rockers (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Ciaffone <chuckc@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:38:24 -0400
OK, I did it again. All is quiet and sems real smooth. I went back and re-adjusted the valves, then went thru and checked them all again. Now it sounds fine. I even think the exhaust note is a little
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00643.html (7,570 bytes)

5. Re: Installing Roller Rockers (score: 1)
Author: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:15:05 EDT
<< Are roller rockers by nature more noisy? >> The hi-lift roller rockers are noisier because they require a larger than standard clearance. If you are using the hi-lift rockers (roller or otherwise)
/html/spridgets/1999-10/msg00655.html (7,541 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu