Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intake\s+Manifolds\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intake\s+Manifolds\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 22:31:16 -0500; I dug up the Super Ford article mentioned earlier. It appeared in the July 1988 issue and was titled "Small Block Intake Manifold Survey". In the article they flow bench and dyno test 10 different in; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00160.html (9,441 bytes)
2. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 09:17:09 -0700; Thanks for taking the time to compile this info for us. Could you comment on where you think the F4B would rank relative to the other intakes you list? I realize, as you point out, that the peak HP; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00165.html (10,725 bytes)
3. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 10:10:51 -0700; Thanks for the manifold tech data. It will go into my ever-growing file of organized list responses that appear to have general interest. This is for the Tiger web site I am planning for the list, a; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00166.html (8,350 bytes)
4. RE: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <cthompson@rrinc.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:45:15 -0400; Not sure what the problem is here with a $200 url cost and $300/year hosting cost. If needed, I'll host the page for free at my company (we have a 10Mb connection), but there are better ways, I belie; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00180.html (9,579 bytes)
5. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 08:18:34 -0500; The Tiger manifold used in the dyno test was a low rise. Looked about as tall as the stock intake and performed about the same. Much better intakes out there. Dan Jones -- There is also the High Rise; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00226.html (7,581 bytes)
6. intake manifolds (score: 1): Author: "Gegg, Bill" <billgegg@ci.antioch.ca.us>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:32:02 -0700; Am rebuilding a 289 for my Tiger and am thinking about a different intake manifold. I was wondering what are some thoughts on different types of manifolds, specifically performance, hood clearance, a; /html/tigers/1998-04/msg00173.html (6,925 bytes)
7. Re: intake manifolds (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:30:22 +0100; Very generous to offer a valuable trunk lid. As to your manifold question, I've had soe experience with both Mustangs and Tigers, and have recently shared this with some list people. As to your indi; /html/tigers/1998-04/msg00176.html (10,561 bytes)
8. Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: john brawley <johnj7@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 17:08:59 -0800; I have a general question on manifold selections. I am putting a stock 289 back into my car and have both the stock cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold and a F4B. I plan on using a Autolite 4100 carb; /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00229.html (7,044 bytes)
9. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: MWood24020 <MWood24020@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:46:43 EST; << The question is there any advantge performance wise with the F4B? I would like to reduce weight and I can save 20lbs(?) with the F4B. What are the pros and cons of each manifold with my stock conf; /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00230.html (7,709 bytes)
10. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Allan Connell <alcon@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 09:49:15 -0800; Speaking of F4B's, I know someone who has one and is willing to part with it. I have no financial interest in this manifold. E-mail me directly if you want more info and I will forward contact infor; /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00241.html (8,231 bytes)
11. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 15:46:43 +0000; I am putting a stock 289 back into my car and have both the stock cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold and a F4B. I plan on using a Autolite 4100 carb and the stock exhaust manifold. The question is th; /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00244.html (9,231 bytes)
12. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 15:55:36 +0000; Oh yes, one more detail. If you don't have the F4B that was specifically made for the Tiger. the temp sender threads are wrong, and your sender won't fit. It cannot be re-tapped to the required 9/16; /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00245.html (9,362 bytes)
13. Re: Intake Manifolds (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@mintcity.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 07:12:11 -0500; While on the subject of intake manifolds, can anyone identify the intake on my car? It is a aluminim 4 BBL intake that sits very low in the valley & has the number 1001395-6 and the date 11-16-65. It; /html/tigers/1998-03/msg00249.html (7,070 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]