Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intake\s+manifold\s+for\s+Weber\s+DCOE\s+questions\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intake\s+manifold\s+for\s+Weber\s+DCOE\s+questions\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Intake manifold for Weber DCOE questions. (score: 1): Author: "Bill Miller" <millerb@netusa1.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 21:10:32 -0500; I am in the process of making an intake manifold for a single Weber sidedraft. As the price for the carb from the importer is <$250, I figure I can make a good stainless steel intake for it and not; /html/spitfires/1999-03/msg00498.html (7,349 bytes)
2. Re: Intake manifold for Weber DCOE questions. (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:22:30 -0800; I had one of the Cannon manifolds for a short time and was very dissatisfied with its design. It may work well for track purposes when the pedal is mostly to the metal. But for street use it concern; /html/spitfires/1999-03/msg00503.html (8,375 bytes)
3. Re: Intake manifold for Weber DCOE questions. (score: 1): Author: stan.part@att.net; Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:19:09 +0000; Joe's right about the un-even mixture distribution. Go to: http://www.vtr.org/maintain/spit-carbs/topview.html to see a picture illustrating this. If you haven't got some dimensions yet, email me an; /html/spitfires/1999-03/msg00556.html (7,392 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]