Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intake\s+manifold\s+on\s+an\s+early\s+TR\-6\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Intake\s+manifold\s+on\s+an\s+early\s+TR\-6\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Intake manifold on an early TR-6. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:40:48 -0700; ** This pre heating passage on ANY manifold is there to heat the spot to help aid in fuel vaporization for more complete combustion (better emissions) and smoother idle and off idle operation. PROPE; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00493.html (8,500 bytes)
2. RE: Intake manifold on an early TR-6. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:10:13 -0700; Not to stir the pot, but for my own interest. If the coolant is actually cooling the intake during running, would this not result in better mass flow. In other words if you ran another radiator and f; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00497.html (9,422 bytes)
3. Re: Intake manifold on an early TR-6. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:04:36 -0400; To further extend the life of this thread, and for purely entertainment purposes, I offer forth this small bit of automotive wizardry, from my own experience- non lbc... When I was completing the fra; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00498.html (9,221 bytes)
4. RE: Intake manifold on an early TR-6. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:12:10 -0700 . com>; It's true at least in theory, if you can cool the intake charge you can get greater density which usually means more power at full throttle. But, the coolant is actually warming the intake manifold,; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00504.html (8,733 bytes)
5. Re: Intake manifold on an early TR-6. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:49:07 -0700 (PDT); < snip > Man. . .that is one authorative answer Barry. Thanks. I was going to counter with the fact that my TR-4 that doesn't have a coolant passage on the intake manifold and seems to run fine. . .b; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00505.html (8,891 bytes)
6. RE: Intake manifold on an early TR-6. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:00:34 -0700; I guess when you think about the intake manifold, it really does not have time to heat the intake air very much anyway, as you said, very little resistance and high velocity. Ed Ed : It's true at lea; /html/triumphs/2001-10/msg00506.html (9,320 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]