Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+a\s+\"B\"\s+Really\s+Worth\s+It\?\s+longish\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+a\s+\"B\"\s+Really\s+Worth\s+It\?\s+longish\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Is a "B" Really Worth It? longish (score: 1): Author: baldycotton@pop.mindspring.com; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 14:16:39 -0400; Yikes! Porque questan mucho dinero! Not only is a belt a bad idea... but in my '94 Intrepid, they used a PLASTIC tensioner! And of course, when you get up to 60,000 miles, at which time the belt is s; /html/mgs/1998-06/msg01117.html (7,891 bytes)
2. Re: Is a "B" Really Worth It? longish (score: 1): Author: Chuck Schaefer <crschaef@mc.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:55:14 -0500; Well, I've had both chains and belts on many of my cars. Th reason fo the belts are that they are more efficient. They use less power than thier counterpart, the chain. As a result, higher mileage. T; /html/mgs/1998-06/msg01139.html (9,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]