Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+the\s+MG\s+T\-Series\s+Mid\s+Engine\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+the\s+MG\s+T\-Series\s+Mid\s+Engine\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Is the MG T-Series Mid Engine? (score: 1): Author: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@insightbb.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:38:17 -0500; This may sound crazy, but it seems to me that the MG T series cars have the engine closer to the middle of the car than the so called modern "mid engine" sports cars. I didn't measure, but I bet the; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00721.html (7,174 bytes)
2. Re: Is the MG T-Series Mid Engine? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:50:23 -0800; One occasionally sees vehicles referred to as "front-mid-engined" -- the Panoz GTs fit that description. Probably in the days before "rear-mid-engined" was a concept, it was merely considered good we; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00722.html (8,259 bytes)
3. Re: Is the MG T-Series Mid Engine? (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:33:06 -0500; If just isn't Panoz phrasing it this way. If anyone recalls TVR's advertisements from the 1970s, of the 2500M, you would remember that TVR considered that car to be mid-engined. Apparently the Triump; /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00725.html (7,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]