Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+there\s+a\s+need\s+for\s+better\s+identification\s+of\s+FOT\s+emails\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+there\s+a\s+need\s+for\s+better\s+identification\s+of\s+FOT\s+emails\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Is there a need for better identification of FOT emails ? (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:46:15 EST; Is there anyway we can thwart this by using subject headings, or are these viruses so sophisticated as to be able to able to use a subject line from another email? Cary; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00174.html (6,760 bytes)
2. Re: Is there a need for better identification of FOT emails ? (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:34:44 -0600; Nope. They are indeed so "sophisticated," in that they not only spoof addresses, as well as creating mix-n-match addresses, but they also steal random subject headers from other e-mail traffic in som; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00178.html (8,069 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]