Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+this\s+the\s+ugliest\s+Spitfire\s+\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+this\s+the\s+ugliest\s+Spitfire\s+\?\?\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Alex Cherington <a_flying_scotsman@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:56:33 -0700 (PDT); Check out this baby...... http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2412975467&category=29760 __________________________________ The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://searc; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00369.html (7,842 bytes)
2. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Jdgar0649@aol.com; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:12:50 EDT; Well, it is the "very unusual and rare DUTTON FIBREGLASS CONVERSION KIT,front and rear." I guess that gives it a certain "air". Certainly a "sporty" thing in a dashing sort of "I' ve just got to make; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00370.html (7,734 bytes)
3. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Dan Canaan <flinters@picarefy.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:22:35 -0700; Wow. That's... ah..... strange. It's valuable now as just an alternative (if a bad one) aftermarket kit available for the cars. It *is* historical, technically. -- This message has been sent by Dan C; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00371.html (8,343 bytes)
4. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: "William Davies" <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:33:56 +0100; I wonder why it's so rare? :^) Possibly the ugliest Spitfire, hardly the ugliest Dutton..... Cheers, Bill. -- Rarebits4classics .......just what you've been looking for PO Box 1232 Calne Wiltshire SN; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00372.html (8,195 bytes)
5. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Terry Thompson <firespiter@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:40:58 -0700 (PDT); I don't know about the Ugliest. I think the award for that has to go to the GT6 with the GM or Mopar front end. It probably should still go on the "things you shouldn't do to a spitfire" web site. Wh; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00373.html (7,942 bytes)
6. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Howard Baugues <bauguesh@abcs.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:34:15 -0500; I posted the site you are looking for (I think) "What NOT to do with a Spitfire or GT6" http://www.wvbscc.org/nass/notspit.html Looks like I have a few more to add to the WALL of Shame! Howard Baugu; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00374.html (8,354 bytes)
7. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Jdgar0649@aol.com; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:44:37 EDT; Hey wait, I just thought of something. The 2CV is pretty ugly, but it is SO UGLY that it is cute (I'd love to have one). Maybe this could fall under that category? Could also be that I have been out; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00375.html (7,732 bytes)
8. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Sam Gentry <sam@spit6.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:48:42 -0400; It looks like the job was well done, but my motto is: If a job is not worth doing it is not worth doing well. Sam /// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majo; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00376.html (7,857 bytes)
9. Re: Is this the ugliest Spitfire ??? (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:54:24 -0700; I guess there is no accounting for taste! Joe /// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/spitfires/2003-04/msg00378.html (7,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]